← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments
Haoge Chang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06891
170
Citation mentions
81
Cited references
18
Sections
15,136
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cai, Jing and De Janvry, Alain and Sadoulet, Elisa... 2015 14 7 24.5 0.082 1.000 100%
2 Aronow, Peter M and Samii, Cyrus 2017 8 5 13.5 0.047 1.000 100%
3 Lin, Winston 2013 9 5 13.5 0.053 1.000 100%
4 Middleton, Joel A 2018 5 3 6.5 0.029 1.000 100%
5 Middleton, Joel A 2021 11 6 19.5 0.065 1.000 100%
6 Cohen, Peter L and Fogarty, Colin B 2020 5 3 7.5 0.029 1.000 100%
7 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 2015 5 5 8.5 0.029 1.000 100%
8 Horn, Roger A and Johnson, Charles R 2012 5 5 10.0 0.029 1.000 100%
9 Freedman, David A 2008 4 4 5.5 0.024 0.928 100%
10 Guo, Kevin and Basse, Guillaume 2021 4 3 6.5 0.024 0.928 100%
11 Chaudhuri, Arijit and Stenger, Horst 2005 3 3 3.5 0.018 0.843 100%
12 Sa 2003 3 3 3.5 0.018 0.843 100%
13 Mukerjee, Rahul and Dasgupta, Tirthankar and Rubin... 2018 3 3 4.5 0.018 0.843 100%
14 Isaki, Cary T and Fuller, Wayne A 1982 3 3 6.0 0.018 0.843 100%
15 Hudgens, Michael G and Halloran, M Elizabeth 2008 3 2 2.5 0.018 0.737 100%
16 Gao, Mengsi and Ding, Peng 2023 3 2 3.0 0.018 0.737 100%
17 Sa 2021 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
18 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W 2022 2 2 1.5 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Roth, Jonathan and Sant'Anna, Pedro HC 2021 2 2 1.5 0.012 0.644 100%
20 Splawa-Neyman, Jerzy and Dabrowska, Dorota M and S... 1990 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Schochet, Peter Z and Pashley, Nicole E and Miratr... 2021 2 2 1.5 0.012 0.644 100%
22 Freedman, David A 2008 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.644 100%
23 Lei, Lihua and Ding, Peng 2021 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.644 100%
24 Aronow, Peter M and Green, Donald P and Lee, Donal... 2014 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.644 100%
25 Christopher Harshaw and Joel A. Middleton and Fred... 2021 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.644 100%
26 Fattorini, Lorenzo 2006 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
27 Brewer, KRW 1979 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
28 Wright, Roger L 1983 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
29 Middleton, Joel A 2021 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
30 Lim, Lek-Heng 2005 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
31 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
32 Andrews, Donald WK 1992 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
33 Sacerdote, Bruce 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Ashraf, Nava and Bandiera, Oriana 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Miguel, Edward and Kremer, Michael 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Kang, Joseph DY and Schafer, Joseph L 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Freedman, David A 2008 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Bloniarz, Adam and Liu, Hanzhong and Zhang, Cun-Hu... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Wu, Edward and Gagnon-Bartsch, Johann A 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Middleton, Joel A and Aronow, Peter M 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Lu, Jiannan 2016 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Li, Xinran and Ding, Peng 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Negi, Akanksha and Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Hu, Yuchen and Li, Shuangning and Wager, Stefan 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Pollmann, Michael 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Aronow, Peter M and Middleton, Joel A 2013 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Robins, James M 1988 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Pashley, Nicole E and Miratrix, Luke W 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
49 de Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Ruonan Xu and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Bugni, Federico A and Canay, Ivan A and Shaikh, Az... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Bugni, Federico A and Canay, Ivan A and Shaikh, Az... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Bai, Yuehao and Romano, Joseph P and Shaikh, Azeem... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Bai, Yuehao and Liu, Jizhou and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Cytrynbaum, Max 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Bugni, Federico and Canay, Ivan and Shaikh, Azeem ... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Li, Xinran and Ding, Peng 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Sa 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Leung, Michael P 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Wang, Ye and Samii, Cyrus and Chang, Haoge and Aro... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Manski, Charles F 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Sa 1984 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 White, Halbert 1980 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Wu, Jason and Ding, Peng 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Wu, Chien-Fu 1981 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Li, Ker-Chau 1983 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Kallus, Nathan 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Harshaw, Christopher and Sa 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Bai, Yuehao 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Basse, Guillaume W and Ding, Yi and Toulis, Panos 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Ni, Tu and Bojinov, Iavor and Zhao, Jinglong 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Chang, Haoge (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Bickel, Peter J and Klaassen, Chris AJ and Bickel,... 1993 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Chen, Louis HY and Shao, Qi-Man 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Nocedal, Jorge and Wright, Stephen 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Cai, Jing and De Janvry, Alain and Sadoulet, Elisa... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Lin, Winston and others 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 Vershynin, Roman 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 R Core Team 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 Qi, Liqun and Luo, Ziyan 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.