← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\Large\bfseries Debiased Fixed Effects Estimation of Binary Logit Models with Three-Dimensional Panel Data
Amrei Stammann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04073
118
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
11
Sections
12,312
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Fernández-Val, Weidner 2018 7 4 11.0 0.059 1.000 100%
2 Hahn, Newey 2004 6 5 11.0 0.051 1.000 100%
3 Weidner, Zylkin 2021 16 9 27.0 0.136 0.979 94%
4 Fernández-Val, Weidner 2016 29 13 48.0 0.246 0.964 90%
5 Hinz, Stammann, Wanner (self) 2020 3 3 5.0 0.025 0.843 100%
6 Fernández-Val 2009 3 3 5.0 0.025 0.843 100%
7 Hahn, Kuersteiner 2011 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Dhaene, Jochmans 2015 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 Kim, Sun 2016 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
10 Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, Weidner 2020 3 3 2.0 0.025 0.585 33%
11 Rasch 1960 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
12 Chamberlain 1980 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
13 Jochmans, Otsu 2019 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
14 Stammann (self) 2018 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
15 Neyman, Scott 1948 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
16 Andersen 1970 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
17 Honoré, Kyriazidou 2000 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
18 Honoré, Weidner 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
19 Head, Mayer 2014 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
20 Hahn, Kuersteiner 2002 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
21 Lancaster 2002 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Woutersen 2002 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Sartori 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Carro 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Arellano, Bonhomme 2009 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Bester, Hansen 2009 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Pakel 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Schumann, Severini, Tripathi 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Higgins, Jochmans 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Schumann 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Arellano, Hahn 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Leng, Mao, Sun 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Charbonneau 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Jochmans 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Yang, Zhang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Jochmans 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Souillard 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Helpman, Melitz, Rubinstein 2008 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Guimarães, Portugal 2010 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Bergé 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Correia, Guimarães, Zylkin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Czarnowske, Stammann (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Czarnowske, Stammann (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Conte, Cotterlaz, Mayer 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Egger, Larch 2008 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Feng, Wang, Chen, Tu 2014 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.110 0%
47 Jochmans, Weidner 2019 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
48 Hansen 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
49 Hoeffding 1963 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
50 Wainwright 2019 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.