Citation Analysis

Semiparametric Discrete Choice Models for Bundles
Fu Ouyang, Thomas Tao Yang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00013
166
Citation mentions
70
Cited references
10
Sections
21,169
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Fox, Jeremy T and Lazzati, Natalia 2017 6 3 9.0 0.036 1.000 100%
2 Han,Aaron K. 1987 5 3 9.0 0.030 1.000 100%
3 Sherman,Robert P. 1993 7 4 14.0 0.042 1.000 100%
4 Sherman, Robert P 1994 5 4 10.0 0.030 1.000 100%
5 Sherman, Robert P 1994 9 4 18.0 0.054 1.000 100%
6 Kim,Jeankyung and Pollard,David 1990 13 6 26.0 0.078 1.000 100%
7 Seo, Myung Hwan and Otsu, Taisuke 2018 22 6 44.0 0.133 1.000 100%
8 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie 2020 6 3 12.0 0.036 1.000 100%
9 Shi, Xiaoxia and Shum, Matthew and Song, Wei 2018 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
10 Abrevaya, Jason and Huang, Jian 2005 3 3 6.0 0.018 0.843 100%
11 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 3 3 6.0 0.018 0.843 100%
12 Wang, Rui 2023 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
13 Pakes,Ariel and Pollard,David 1989 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
14 Kohler, Michael and Langer, Sophie 2021 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
15 Serfling, Robert J 2009 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
16 Fan, Ying 2013 2 2 2.0 0.012 0.644 100%
17 Sun, Tao 2024 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
18 Gentzkow, Matthew 2007 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Khan, Shakeeb and Ouyang, Fu and Tamer, Elie (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
20 Lewbel,Arthur 2000 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Fox, Jeremy T. 2007 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
22 Yan, Jin and Yoo, Hong Il 2019 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
23 Horowitz,Joel L. 1992 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
24 Manski, Charles F. 1987 3 1 6.0 0.018 0.585 100%
25 Allen, Roy and Rehbeck, John 2019 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
26 Allen, Roy and Rehbeck, John 2022 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
27 Subbotin, Viktor 2007 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
28 Hansen, Bruce E 2008 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
29 Gine 1990 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
30 Nolan,Deborah and Pollard,David 1987 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
31 Liu, Hongju and Chintagunta, Pradeep K and Zhu, Ti... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Lee, Sanghak and Kim, Jaehwan and Allenby, Greg M 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M and Sinkins... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Ershov, Daniel and Laliberte 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Iaria, Alessandro and Wang, Ao 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Berry, Steve and Khwaja, Ahmed and Kumar, Vineet a... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Sher, Itai and Kim, Kyoo il 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Dunker, Fabian and Hoderlein, Stefan and Kaido, Hi... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Ouyang, Fu and Yang, Thomas Tao and Zhang, Hanghui (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Lee,Lung-fei 1995 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Altonji, Joseph G and Matzkin, Rosa L 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Berry, Steven T and Haile, Philip A 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Ahn, Hyungtaik and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Powell, ... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Graham, Bryan S 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Toth, Peter 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Candelaria, Luis E 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Gao, Wayne Yuan and Li, Ming and Xu, Sheng 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Abrevaya, Jason and Hausman, Jerry A and Khan, Sha... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Hong, Han and Mahajan, Aprajit and Nekipelov, Deni... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Cavanagh, Christopher and Sherman, Robert P 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Jin, Zhezhen and Ying, Zhiliang and Wei, L. J. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Horowitz, Joel L 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Chen,Xiaohong and Linton,Oliver and van Keilegom 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Arcones, Miguel A and Gine, Evarist 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Devroye, Luc 1978 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Pakes, Ariel and Porter, Jack 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Gao, Wayne Yuan and Li, Ming 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Lee, S. M. S. and Pun, M. C. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Li, Qi and Racine, Jeffrey Scott 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Hall, Peter and Racine, Jeff and Li, Qi 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Hayfield, Tristen and Racine, Jeffrey S 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Storn, R M and Price, K V 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Mullen, Katharine and Ardia, David and Gil, David ... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Farrell, Max H and Liang, Tengyuan and Misra, Sanj... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Gu 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Wellner, Jon A and Zhan, Yihui 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 v 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Cameron, A Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.