← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Worst-Case Optimal Multi-Armed Gaussian Best Arm Identification with a Fixed Budget
Masahiro Kato
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19788
287
Citation mentions
89
Cited references
15
Sections
7,713
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 39 11 76.5 0.136 0.991 97%
2 13 9 24.5 0.045 0.974 92%
3 9 4 16.5 0.031 0.962 89%
4 8 6 14.5 0.028 0.957 88%
5 22 12 38.5 0.077 0.952 86%
6 7 7 13.0 0.024 0.950 86%
7 4 3 6.0 0.014 0.928 100%
8 29 14 48.0 0.101 0.926 79%
9 6 5 7.0 0.021 0.874 67%
10 9 7 13.5 0.031 0.874 67%
11 4 3 4.5 0.014 0.843 75%
12 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
13 5 4 7.0 0.017 0.843 60%
14 7 2 6.0 0.024 0.781 71%
15 9 6 9.5 0.031 0.763 44%
16 4 3 4.0 0.014 0.737 50%
17 4 3 5.0 0.014 0.737 50%
18 3 3 4.5 0.010 0.737 67%
19 3 3 3.5 0.010 0.737 67%
20 5 3 4.5 0.017 0.737 40%
21 3 2 4.5 0.010 0.644 67%
22 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
23 5 2 3.5 0.017 0.644 40%
24 3 3 2.0 0.010 0.585 33%
25 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.511 50%
26 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.511 50%
27 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.511 50%
28 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.511 50%
29 3 2 3.0 0.010 0.511 33%
30 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.511 50%
31 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.511 50%
32 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
33 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.511 50%
34 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
38 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
39 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
41 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
44 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
45 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
47 2 2 1.0 0.007 0.139 0%
48 3 1 1.5 0.010 0.126 0%
49 2 1 1.0 0.007 0.110 0%
50 2 1 1.0 0.007 0.110 0%
51 2 1 1.0 0.007 0.110 0%
52 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
53 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
54 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
55 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
56 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
57 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
58 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
59 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
60 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
61 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
62 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
63 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
64 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
65 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
66 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
67 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
68 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
69 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
70 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
71 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
72 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
73 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
74 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
75 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
76 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
77 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
78 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
79 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
80 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
81 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
82 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
83 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
84 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
85 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
86 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
87 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
88 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
89 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.