Citation Analysis

\bf\sc Cluster-Randomized Trials with Cross-Cluster Interference
Michael P. Leung
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18836
89
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
14
Sections
13,876
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hayes and Moulton 2017 6 3 8.0 0.067 1.000 100%
2 Hudgens and Halloran 2008 6 3 10.0 0.067 1.000 100%
3 Egger, Haushofer, Miguel, Niehaus and Walker 2022 14 3 25.0 0.157 1.000 100%
4 Leung (self) 2022 10 6 17.0 0.112 1.000 100%
5 Cao, Hansen, Kozbur and Villacorta 2024 4 3 7.0 0.045 0.928 100%
6 Faridani and Niehaus 2024 3 3 5.0 0.034 0.843 100%
7 Baird, Bohren, McIntosh and Ozler 2018 3 3 6.0 0.034 0.843 100%
8 Homan, Hiscox, Mweresa, Masiga, Mukabana et al. 2016 3 2 4.0 0.034 0.737 100%
9 Staples, Ogburn and Onnela 2015 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Wainwright 2019 4 1 8.0 0.045 0.644 100%
11 Jenish and Prucha 2009 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
12 Ross 2011 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
13 O'Hara, Blanco, Leekha, Stafford, Slobogean, Ludem... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Jarvis, Di Tanna, Lewis, Alexander and Edmunds 2017 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Muralidharan and Niehaus 2017 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Karrer, Shi, Bhole, Goldman, Palmer, Gelman, Konut... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Moulton, O'Brien, Kohberger, Chang, Reid, Weatherh... 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Binka, Indome and Smith 1998 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Imai, King and Nall 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Schochet, Pashley, Miratrix and Kautz 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Lahiri and Zhu 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Hansen and Lee 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Leung (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 McCann, van den Berg, Takken, Chetwynd, Giorgi et ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Andrews 1991 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Sur, Ochiai, Bhattacharya, Ganguly, Ali, Manna, Du... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 CDC 2025 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Hemming, Girling, Sitch, Marsh and Lilford 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Hemming, Eldridge, Forbes, Weijer and Taljaard 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Halloran, Auranen, Baird, Basta, Bellan et al. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Alexander, Lenhart and Anaya-Izquierdo 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Jarvis, Multerer, Lewis, Binka, Edmunds, Alexander... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Multerer, Glass, Vanobberghen and Smith 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Guerra, Reiner, Perkins, Lindsay, Midega et al. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Schubert and Rousseeuw 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Bhattacharjee and Mitra 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Kriegel, Kroger, Sander and Zimek 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Armstrong and Kolesar 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Leung (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Leung (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 2 1 2.0 0.022 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.