Citation Analysis

\textsc\LargeCovariate Balancing and the Equivalence of Weighting and Doubly Robust Estimators of Average Treatment Effects
Tymon Słoczyński, S. Derya Uysal, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18563
139
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
7
Sections
6,224
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Egel, Graham, and Pinto 2008 10 5 14.0 0.072 1.000 100%
2 Graham, Pinto, and Egel 2012 8 5 10.0 0.058 1.000 100%
3 Graham, Pinto, and Egel 2016 7 4 9.5 0.050 1.000 100%
4 Hainmueller 2012 6 4 6.5 0.043 1.000 100%
5 Imai and Ratkovic 2014 8 4 9.5 0.058 1.000 100%
6 Sant'Anna and Zhao 2020 24 6 39.5 0.173 1.000 100%
7 Aizer, Eli, Ferrie, and Lleras-Muney 2016 9 3 17.0 0.065 1.000 100%
8 S\loczy\'nski 2022 5 2 8.0 0.036 0.874 100%
9 LaLonde 1986 6 2 11.0 0.043 0.874 100%
10 Callaway and Sant'Anna 2021 5 2 8.5 0.036 0.874 100%
11 Abadie 2005 4 2 7.0 0.029 0.811 100%
12 Tan 2020 3 2 4.5 0.022 0.737 100%
13 Robins, Sued, Lei-Gomez, and Rotnitzky 2007 3 1 1.5 0.022 0.585 100%
14 Bruns-Smith, Dukes, Feller, and Ogburn 2025 3 1 1.5 0.022 0.585 100%
15 Sant'Anna, Song, and Xu 2022 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
16 Kline 2011 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
17 Chattopadhyay and Zubizarreta 2023 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
18 S\loczy\'nski, Uysal, and Wooldridge (self) 2022 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
19 Dehejia and Wahba 1999 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
20 Smith and Todd 2005 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
21 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull, and Kolesar 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
22 Chen 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 S\loczy\'nski 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad, and Torgovitsky 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Caetano and Callaway 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Simmons, Nelson, and Simonsohn 2011 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Vivalt 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Ferman, Pinto, and Possebom 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Hirano, Imbens, and Ridder 2003 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Robins, Rotnitzky, and Zhao 1994 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Wooldridge (self) 2007 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
32 S\loczy\'nski and Wooldridge (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Imbens and Wooldridge (self) 2009 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Abadie and Cattaneo 2018 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Uysal (self) 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Zhao and Percival 2017 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Zubizarreta 2015 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Zhao 2019 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Heiler 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Singh and Sun 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
41 S\loczy\'nski, Uysal, and Wooldridge (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Chernozhukov, Newey, and Singh 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Wooldridge (self) 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Knaus 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Frolich 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Lee and Wooldridge (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.