Citation Analysis

Fair Adaptive Experiments
Waverly Wei, Xinwei Ma, Jingshen Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16290
82
Citation mentions
72
Cited references
5
Sections
4,116
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hu and Rosenberger 2006 3 2 6.0 0.037 0.737 100%
2 Rosenberger 2002 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.644 100%
3 Hu and Zhang 2004 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.644 100%
4 Hu and Rosenberger 2003 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.644 100%
5 Hu, Zhu and Hu 2015 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.644 100%
6 Chien, Deliu, Turner, Weller, Villar and Kilbertus 2022 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
7 Kato, Ishihara, Honda and Narita 2020 2 1 1.0 0.024 0.511 100%
8 Joseph, Kearns, Morgenstern and Roth 2016 2 1 1.0 0.024 0.511 100%
9 Hall and Heyde 2014 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
10 Karlan and Zinman 2008 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
11 Kharitonov, Vorobev, Macdonald, Serdyukov and Ouni... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
12 Kohavi and Longbotham 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Villar, Bowden and Wason 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Wu, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang and Wang (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Wu, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang and Wang (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Robertson, Lee, Lopez-Kolkovska and Villar 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Rosenberger and Lachin 1993 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Wei and Durham (self) 1978 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Bai and Hu 2005 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Janson 2004 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Eisele 1994 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Hu, Zhang and He 2009 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Tymofyeyev, Rosenberger and Hu 2007 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Rosenberger and Hu 2004 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Bandyopadhyay and Biswas 1999 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Bugni, Canay and Shaikh 2019 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Lin, Zhu and Su 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Rosenberger, Vidyashankar and Agarwal 2001 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Villar and Rosenberger 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Zhang, Hu, Cheung and Chan 2007 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Zhao, Ma, Wang and Hu (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Pocock and Simon 1975 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Zelen 1994 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Aletti, Ghiglietti and Rosenberger 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Villar, Bowden and Wason 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Villar, Wason and Bowden 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Williamson, Jacko, Villar and Jaki 2017 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Giovagnoli 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Thall and Wathen 2007 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Yin, Chen and Jack Lee 2012 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Hahn 1998 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Newey 1990 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
43 van der Vaart 1998 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val and Hansen 2017 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Cattaneo 2010 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Cattaneo, Jansson and Ma 2019 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Chen, Linton and Van Keilegom 2003 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
48 Farrell 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
49 Hirano, Imbens and Ridder 2003 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
50 Ma, Sasaki and Wang (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
51 Ma and Wang (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
52 Wager and Athey 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
53 Wei, Petersen, van der Laan, Zheng, Wu and Wang (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
54 Bai 2022 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
55 Tabord-Meehan 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
56 Simchi-Levi and Wang (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
57 Chen, Cuellar, Luo, Modi, Nemlekar and Nikolaidis 2020 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
58 Gillen, Jung, Kearns and Roth 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
59 Grazzi, Akhavan, Falk, Cella and Pontil 2022 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
60 Joseph, Kearns, Morgenstern, Neel and Roth 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
61 Metevier, Giguere, Brockman, Kobren, Brun, Brunski... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
62 Patil, Ghalme, Nair and Narahari 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
63 Wu, Zheng and Zhu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
64 Wu, Zheng and Zhu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
65 Assmann, Pocock, Enos and Kasten 2000 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
66 Kubota, Ichinose, Scagliotti, Spigel, Kim, Shinkai... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
67 Xu, Trippa, Muller and Ji 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
68 Arnsperger 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
69 Aziz, Li, Moulin and Wu 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
70 Hossain, Mladenovic and Shah 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
71 Moulin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
72 Zhang and Rosenberger 2006 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.