Citation Analysis

\bf Testing for equivalence of pre-trends in Difference-in-Differences estimation
Holger Dette, Martin Schumann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15796
75
Citation mentions
39
Cited references
14
Sections
9,338
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hartman, Erin and Hidalgo, F. Daniel 2018 4 3 6.0 0.053 0.928 100%
2 Berger, Roger L and Hsu, Jason C 1996 4 3 8.0 0.053 0.928 100%
3 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2021 6 2 12.0 0.080 0.874 100%
4 Di Tella, Rafael and Schargrodsky, Ernesto 2004 5 2 9.0 0.067 0.874 100%
5 Ariella Kahn-Lang and Kevin Lang 2020 3 2 4.0 0.040 0.737 100%
6 Roth, Jonathan 2022 3 2 5.0 0.040 0.737 100%
7 Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan 2023 3 2 4.0 0.040 0.737 100%
8 Donohue, John J and Ho, D and Leahy, Patrick 2013 3 2 5.0 0.040 0.737 100%
9 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2023 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
10 Fang, Zheng and Santos, Andres 2019 3 1 6.0 0.040 0.585 100%
11 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
12 Brantly Callaway and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna 2021 2 2 2.5 0.027 0.511 50%
13 Liyang Sun and Sarah Abraham 2021 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
14 Jonathan Roth and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna and Alyssa ... 2023 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
15 Dette, H. and Mo (self) 2018 7 2 5.0 0.093 0.457 14%
16 Bilinski, Alyssa and Hatfield, Laura A. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Manski, Charles F and Pepper, John V 2018 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna and Jun Zhao 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Baltagi, Badi H. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Schuirmann, Donald J 1987 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Dette, H. and Wied, D. (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Dette, Holger and Wu, Weichi (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Dette, Holger and Kokot, Kevin and Aue, Alexander (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Dette, Holger and Kokot, Kevin and Volgushev, Stan... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Masten, Matthew A. and Poirier, Alexandre 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Kuelbs, J. 1973 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Samur, J. D. 1987 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Merlev\`ede, F. and Peligrad, M. and Utev, S. 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Andrews, Donald W. K. and Soares, Gustavo 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Romano, Joseph P. and Shaikh, Azeem M. and Wolf, M... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Canay, Ivan A. and Shaikh, Azeem M. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Han Hong and Jessie Li 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Andrew Goodman-Bacon 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 de Chaisemartin, Clément and D'Haultfœuille, Xavie... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 de Chaisemartin, Clément and D’Haultfœuille, Xavie... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Aad van der Vaart and Jon A. Wellner 1996 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
39 Joseph P. Romano 2005 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.