Citation Analysis

\LARGE On propensity score matching with a diverging number of matches
Yihui He, Fang Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14142
115
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
7
Sections
8,378
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W.s 2016 49 11 90.0 0.426 0.993 98%
2 Hahn, Jinyong 1998 7 5 10.5 0.061 0.950 86%
3 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. 2006 4 3 4.0 0.035 0.928 100%
4 Lin, Zhexiao and Ding, Peng and Han, Fang (self) 2023 4 2 2.5 0.035 0.811 100%
5 Andreou, Elena and Werker, Bas JM 2012 4 2 6.5 0.035 0.811 100%
6 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. 2011 2 2 1.5 0.017 0.644 100%
7 Abadie, Alberto and Imbens, Guido W 2012 2 2 1.5 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Le Cam, Lucien and Yang, Grace Lo 2000 2 2 1.5 0.017 0.644 100%
9 van der Vaart, A. W. 1998 2 2 1.5 0.017 0.644 100%
10 Lin, Zhexiao and Han, Fang (self) 2022 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.511 100%
11 Neyman, Jersey 1923 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
12 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
13 Rosenbaum, Paul R and Rubin, Donald B 1983 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
14 Rosenbaum, Paul R 1987 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
15 Robins, James M and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Zhao, Lu... 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
16 Rubin, Donald B and Thomas, Neal 1996 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
17 Heckman, James J and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Todd, ... 1997 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Scharfstein, Daniel O and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Ro... 1999 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Hirano, Keisuke and Imbens, Guido W and Ridder, Ge... 2003 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Fro 2004 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Fro 2005 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Huber, Martin and Lechner, Michael and Wunsch, Con... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Su, Fangzhou and Mou, Wenlong and Ding, Peng and W... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Imbens, Guido W 2004 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Stuart, Elizabeth A 2010 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Imbens, Guido W 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Pierce, Donald A 1982 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Randles, Ronald H 1982 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Pollard, David 1989 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Andrews, Donald WK 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Robins, James M and Mark, Steven D and Newey, Whit... 1992 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Henmi, Masayuki and Eguchi, Shinto 2004 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Hitomi, Kohtaro and Nishiyama, Yoshihiko and Okui,... 2008 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Lok, Judith J 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Hallin, Marc and La Vecchia, Davide and Liu, Hang 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Hallin, Marc and La Vecchia, Davide and Liu, Hang 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Chatterjee, Sourav 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Azadkia, Mona and Chatterjee, Sourav 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Lin, Zhexiao and Han, Fang (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Abadie, Alberto and Imbens, Guido W 2008 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Lin, Zhexiao and Han, Fang (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Lin, Zhexiao and Han, Fang (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Le Cam, Lucien 1972 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jo 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Bickel, Peter J and Klaassen, Chris AJ and Bickel,... 1998 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.