← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Transparency challenges in policy evaluation with causal machine learning --- improving usability and accountability %%%% Cite as %%%% Update your official citation here when published %
Patrick Rehill, Nicholas Biddle
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13240
200
Citation mentions
90
Cited references
15
Sections
14,738
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 10 6 16.0 0.050 1.000 100%
2 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 5 3 6.0 0.025 1.000 100%
3 Athey, Susan and Tibshirani, Julie and Wager, Stef... 11 7 17.0 0.055 1.000 100%
4 Rehill, Patrick and Biddle, Nicholas (self) 2023 5 4 8.0 0.025 1.000 100%
5 Nie, X and Wager, S 2021 8 4 12.0 0.040 1.000 100%
6 Busuioc, Madalina 6 3 12.0 0.030 1.000 100%
7 Lundberg, Scott and Lee, Su-In 2017 7 5 14.0 0.035 1.000 100%
8 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2019 7 4 14.0 0.035 1.000 100%
9 Sharma, Amit and Syrgkanis, Vasilis and Zhang, Che... 7 3 14.0 0.035 1.000 100%
10 Lechner, Michael 2023 4 3 6.0 0.020 0.928 100%
11 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 4 3 5.0 0.020 0.928 100%
12 Rudin, Cynthia 4 3 6.0 0.020 0.928 100%
13 Künzel, Sören R. and Sekhon, Jasjeet S. and Bickel... 4 3 6.0 0.020 0.928 100%
14 Tiffin, Andrew 4 4 8.0 0.020 0.928 100%
15 Semenova, Vira and Chernozhukov, Victor 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
16 Sagi, Omer and Rokach, Lior 2020 3 3 6.0 0.015 0.843 100%
17 Bénard, Clément and Josse, Julie 2023 3 3 6.0 0.015 0.843 100%
18 Olsen, Johan P. 4 2 7.0 0.020 0.811 100%
19 Ireni Saban, Liza and Sherman, Maya 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
20 Hünermund, Paul and Kaminski, Jermain and Schmitt,... 2021 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
21 Gur Ali, Ozden 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
22 Matthias, Andreas 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
23 Green, Ben and Chen, Yiling 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
24 Lipton, Zachary C 3 2 6.0 0.015 0.737 100%
25 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
26 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W. 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
27 Breiman, Leo 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
28 Domingos, Pedro 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
29 Liu, Sheng and Dissanayake, Shamitha and Patel, Sa... 2014 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
30 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
31 Logg, Jennifer M. and Minson, Julia A. and Moore, ... 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
32 Leigh, Andrew and Ryan, Chris 4 1 8.0 0.020 0.644 100%
33 Lechner, Michael 2019 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
34 Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel and Allo, Patrick and Ta... 3 1 6.0 0.015 0.585 100%
35 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 2 1 2.0 0.010 0.511 100%
36 Levin-Rozalis, Miri 2000 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
37 Santoni de Sio, Filippo and Mecacci, Giulio 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
38 Logg, Jennifer M. 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
39 \cC 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Daoud, Adel and Dubhashi, Devdatt 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Baiardi, Anna and Naghi, Andrea A. 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Knaus, Michael C 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Xu, Feiyu and Uszkoreit, Hans and Du, Yangzhou and... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Kim, Tae Wan and Routledge, Bryan R. 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Rai, Arun 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Holland, Paul W 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Ajzenman, Nicolas and Luna, Laura Becerra and Hern... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Zhou, Hui‐min and Zhan, Rong‐jian and Chen, Xuanyu... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Abadie, Alberto and Imbens, Guido W. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Hahn, P. Richard and Murray, Jared S. and Carvalho... 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Van Der Laan, Mark J. and Polley, Eric C and Hubba... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Manski, Charles F. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Zhou, Zhengyuan and Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Cárdenas, Diana and Lattimore, Finnian and Steinbe... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Kreif, Noemi and DiazOrdaz, Karla and Moreno-Serra... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Cockx, Bart and Lechner, Michael and Bollens, Joos... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Chernozhukov, Victor and Kasahara, Hiroyuki and Sc... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Althaus, Catherine and Bridgman, Peter and Davis, ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 National Audit Office 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Cintron, Dakota W. and Adler, Nancy E. and Gottlie... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Zheng, Li and Yin, Weiwen 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Goodman, Bryce and Flaxman, Seth 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Zarsky, Tal 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Ribeiro, Marco Tulio and Singh, Sameer and Guestri... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Frosst, Nicholas and Hinton, Geoffrey 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Kristjanpoller, Werner and Michell, Kevin and Olso... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Sverdrup, Erik and Kanodia, Ayush and Zhou, Zhengy... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Pearl, Judea 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Citron, Danielle Keats 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Sheikh, Mohammad Ahmad and Goel, Amit Kumar and Ku... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Završnik, Aleš 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Rubin, Donald B. 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Pearl, Judea 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Cukrowska-Torzewska, Ewa and Matysiak, Anna 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Watson, Richard and Cai, Hengrui and An, Xinming a... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Celli, Viviana 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 grf-labs 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Saarela, Mirka and Jauhiainen, Susanne 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Louppe, Gilles and Wehenkel, Louis and Sutera, Ant... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Hines, Oliver and Diaz-Ordaz, Karla and Vansteelan... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Mehrabi, Ninareh and Morstatter, Fred and Saxena, ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Cockx, Bart and Lechner, Michael and Bollens, Joos... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Wager, Stefan 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
85 Semenova, Lesia and Rudin, Cynthia and Parr, Ronal... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
86 Hinton, Geoffrey and Frosst, Nicholas 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
87 Dao, Tri and Kamath, Govinda M. and Syrgkanis, Vas... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
88 Rehill, Patrick and Biddle, Nicholas (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
89 Bahamyirou, Asma and Schnitzer, Mireille E. and Ke... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
90 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.