Citation Analysis

\vspace-3em
Susan Athey, Niall Keleher, Jann Spiess
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08672
52
Citation mentions
36
Cited references
9
Sections
8,566
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hitsch, Gunter, Sanjog Misra, and Walter Zhang 2023 5 4 7.5 0.096 0.928 80%
2 Wager, Stefan and Susan Athey (self) 2018 3 3 5.0 0.058 0.843 100%
3 Chernozhukov, Victor, Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, ... 2019 3 2 5.0 0.058 0.737 100%
4 Yadlowsky, Steve, Scott Fleming, Nigam Shah, Emma ... 2021 3 2 5.0 0.058 0.737 100%
5 Athey, Susan, Peter J Bickel, Aiyou Chen, Guido W ... (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
6 Athey, Susan and Guido Imbens (self) 2016 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
7 Athey, Susan, Julie Tibshirani, and Stefan Wager (self) 2019 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
8 Athey, Susan and Stefan Wager (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
9 Ascarza, Eva 2018 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
10 Fernandez-Lor\'\ia, Carlos and Foster Provost 2022 2 2 3.0 0.038 0.644 100%
11 Nissan, R., S. Kenney, S. Lensing, J. Anderson, T.... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
12 Mullainathan, Sendhil and Jann Spiess (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
13 Athey, Susan and Guido W Imbens (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
14 Kleinberg, Jon, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan,... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
15 Imai, Kosuke and Marc Ratkovic 2013 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
16 Kunzel, Soren R, Jasjeet S Sekhon, Peter J Bickel,... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
17 Nie, Xinkun, Emma Brunskill, and Stefan Wager 2021 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
18 Zhao, Yingqi, Donglin Zeng, A John Rush, and Micha... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
19 Swaminathan, Adith and Thorsten Joachims 2015 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
20 Kitagawa, Toru and Aleksey Tetenov 2018 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
21 Zhou, Zhengyuan, Susan Athey, and Stefan Wager (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
22 Knaus, Michael C., Michael Lechner, and Anthony St... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
23 Yang, Jeremy, Dean Eckles, Paramveer Dhillon, and ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
24 Zhang, Walter W and Sanjog Misra 2022 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
25 Devriendt, Floris, Jeroen Berrevoets, and Wouter V... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
26 Haushofer, Johannes, Paul Niehaus, Carlos Paramo, ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
27 Inoue, Kosuke, Susan Athey, and Yusuke Tsugawa (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
28 Sunstein, Cass R and Richard Thaler 2008 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
29 Castleman, Benjamin L and Lindsay C Page 2016 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
30 ideas42 2016 1 1 1.0 0.019 0.406 100%
31 Tibshirani, Julie, Susan Athey, Erik Sverdrup, and... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
32 Chernozhukov, Victor, Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
33 Rzepakowski, Piotr and Szymon Jaroszewicz 2012 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
34 Zhao, Lihui, Lu Tian, Tianxi Cai, Brian Claggett, ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
35 Sun, Hao, Evan Munro, Georgy Kalashnov, Shuyang Du... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
36 Horvitz, Daniel G and Donovan J Thompson 1952 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.