← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Real-time Prediction of the Great Recession and the Covid-19 Recession
Seulki Chung
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08536
50
Citation mentions
40
Cited references
6
Sections
9,973
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Vrontos, S. and Galakis, J. and Vrontos, I. 2021 5 4 9.0 0.100 1.000 100%
2 Chauvet, M. and Piger, J. 2008 3 3 6.0 0.060 0.843 100%
3 Stock, J. and Watson, M. 1989 2 2 3.0 0.040 0.644 100%
4 Bry, G. and Boschan, C. 1971 2 2 3.0 0.040 0.644 100%
5 Stark, T. and Croushore, D. 2002 2 2 3.0 0.040 0.644 100%
6 Manski, C. and Lerman, S. 1977 2 1 4.0 0.040 0.511 100%
7 Burns, A. and Mitchell, W. 1946 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
8 Stock, J. and Watson, M. 1993 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
9 Canova, F. 1994 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
10 Dueker, M. 1997 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Chauvet, M. and Hamilton, J. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Tian, R. and Shen, G. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Berge, T. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Döpke, J. and Fritsche, U. and Pierdzioch, C. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Davig, T. and Hall, A. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Chatzis, S. and Siakoulis, V. and Petropoulos, A. ... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Park, J. and Phillips, P. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Stekhoven, D and Bühlmann, P. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 King, G. and Zeng, L. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Peduzzi, P. and Concato, J. and Kemper, E. and Hol... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Hoerl, E. and Kennard, W. 1970 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Tibshirani, R. 1996 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Zou, H. and Hastie, T. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Bergmeier, C. and Benitez, J. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Cerqueira, V. and Torgo, L. and Mozetic, I. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Berge, T. and Jorda, O. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Ng, S. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Lucas, R. 1987 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Clark, K. and Leslie, D. and Symons, E. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Barleby, G. 2004 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 Barro, R. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Krebs, T. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Nevalsami, L. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Tharwat, A. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 Liu, W. and Moench, E. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Albert, A. and Anderson, J. 1984 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
37 McCullough, B. and Vinod, H. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
38 Estrella, A. and Mishkin, F. 1998 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
39 Hwang, Y. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
40 Li, H. and Sheng, X. and Yang, J. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.