Citation Analysis

Identification and Estimation in a Class of Potential Outcomes Models
Manu Navjeevan, Rodrigo Pinto, Andres Santos
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05311
151
Citation mentions
66
Cited references
6
Sections
28,093
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, Guido W and Angrist, Joshua D 1994 7 5 12.0 0.046 1.000 100%
2 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander and Walt... 2021 7 4 11.0 0.046 1.000 100%
3 Kline, Patrick and Walters, Christopher R 2016 6 4 11.0 0.040 1.000 100%
4 Le Cam, Lucien and Yang, Grace L 1988 5 3 6.0 0.033 1.000 100%
5 Abadie, Alberto 2003 4 3 6.0 0.026 0.928 100%
6 Chen, Xiaohong and Santos, Andres (self) 2018 8 2 11.0 0.053 0.874 100%
7 Pinto, Rodrigo (self) 2021 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
8 Ludwig, Jens and Liebman, Jeffrey B and Kling, Jef... 2008 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
9 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward 2005 4 2 6.0 0.026 0.811 100%
10 Peter J. Bickel and Chris A.J. Klassen and Yaacov ... 1993 4 2 6.0 0.026 0.811 100%
11 Smucler, Ezequiel and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Robins... 2019 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
12 Chernozhukov, Victor and Escanciano, Juan Carlos a... 2022 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
13 Chernozhukov, Victor and Newey, Whitney K and Sing... 2022 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
14 Heckman, James J and Pinto, Rodrigo (self) 2018 3 2 4.0 0.020 0.737 100%
15 van der Vaart, Aad 1991 3 2 3.0 0.020 0.737 100%
16 Orr, Larry and Feins, Judith D. and Jacob, Robin a... 2003 3 2 4.0 0.020 0.737 100%
17 C. D. Aliprantis and K. C. Border 2006 13 1 13.0 0.086 0.693 100%
18 Vladimir I. Bogachev 2007 6 1 6.0 0.040 0.693 100%
19 D. G. Luenberger 1969 5 1 5.0 0.033 0.693 100%
20 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W 1995 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Imai, Kosuke and Keele, Luke and Yamamoto, Teppei 2010 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Mountjoy, Jack 2022 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Rosenbaum, Paul R and Rubin, Donald B 1983 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
24 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward J 1999 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
25 Fro 2007 3 1 6.0 0.020 0.585 100%
26 Kling, Jeffrey R and Liebman, Jeffrey B and Katz, ... 2007 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
27 Ludwig, Jens and Duncan, Greg J and Gennetian, Lis... 2013 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
28 Pollard, David 2002 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Zhai, Alex 2018 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
30 Neyman, Jerzy 1990 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 C. F. Manski 1990 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Charles F. Manski 2003 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward J 2001 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Balke, Alexander and Pearl, Judea 1997 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Mogstad, Magne and Santos, Andres and Torgovitsky,... (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Tan, Zhiqiang 2006 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Singh, Rahul and Sun, Liyang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 1997 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Rose, Evan K. and Shem-Tov, Yotam 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Lee, Sokbae and Salanie 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Dutz, Deniz and Huitfeldt, Ingrid and Lacouture, S... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Carneiro, Pedro and Heckman, James J and Vytlacil,... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Heckman, James and Pinto, Rodrigo and Savelyev, Pe... (self) 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Fagereng, Andreas and Mogstad, Magne and R\o 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Angrist, Joshua and Autor, David and Pallais, Aman... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Pearl, Judea 2001 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Robins, James M 2003 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Imai, Kosuke and Tingley, Dustin and Yamamoto, Tep... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Fro 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Katz, Lawrence F and Kling, Jeffrey R and Liebman,... 2001 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Kling, Jeffrey R. and Ludwig, Jens and Katz, Lawre... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Clampet-Lundquist, S. and Massey, D. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Bu 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Bartlett, Peter L and Mendelson, Shahar and Neeman... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Fang, Zheng and Santos, Andres (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Chamberlain, Gary 1986 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 Hahn, Jinyong 1998 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 van der Vaart, Aad 1991 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Bogachev, Vladimir I and Smolyanov, Oleg Georgievi... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Munkres, James R 2000 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Rudin, Walter 1991 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 A. W. van der Vaart and J. A. Wellner 1996 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Victor Chernozhukov and Whitney K. Newey and Andre... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.