← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Semidiscrete optimal transport with unknown costs
Yinchu Zhu, Ilya O. Ryzhov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00786
72
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
11
Sections
9,407
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Genevay, A. and Cuturi, M. and Peyre 2016 5 3 10.0 0.069 1.000 100%
2 Goldenshluger, A. and Zeevi, A. 2013 6 4 12.0 0.083 1.000 100%
3 Bastani, H. and Bayati, M. and Khosravi, K. 2021 4 4 7.0 0.056 0.928 100%
4 Carlsson, J. G. and Carlsson, E. and Devulapalli, ... 2016 3 3 5.0 0.042 0.843 100%
5 McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989 3 3 5.0 0.042 0.843 100%
6 Bastani, H. and Bayati, M. 2020 3 3 6.0 0.042 0.843 100%
7 Bharadwaj, V. and Ma, W. and Schwarz, M. and Shanm... 2010 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
8 Villani, C. 2021 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
9 Boursier, E. and Perchet, V. 2024 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
10 Bach, F. and Moulines, E. 2011 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
11 Polyak, B. T. and Juditsky, A. B. 1992 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
12 Broder, Josef and Rusmevichientong, Paat 2012 2 1 4.0 0.028 0.511 100%
13 Garivier, A. and Kaufmann, E. 2016 2 1 4.0 0.028 0.511 100%
14 Peyre 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Ford, L. R. and Fulkerson, D. R. 1956 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Hartmann, V. and Schuhmacher, D. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Santambrogio, F. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Li, L. and Chu, W. and Langford, J. and Schapire, ... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Cheng, H. and Cantu 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Chen, C.-H. and Chick, S. E. and Lee, L. H. and Pu... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Gittins, J. C. and Glazebrook, K. D. and Weber, R. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Han, B. and Ryzhov, I. O. and Defourny, B. (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Alban, A. and Chick, S. E. and Zoumpoulis, S. I. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Shen, H. and Hong, L. J. and Zhang, X. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Abbasi-Yadkori, Y. and Pa 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Glynn, P. W. and Juneja, S. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Russo, Daniel 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Chen, Y. and Ryzhov, I. O. (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Cuturi, M. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Lin, T. and Ho, N. and Jordan, M. I. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Papadakis, N. and Peyre 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Benamou, J.-D. and Froese, B. D. and Oberman, A. M... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Bach, F. and Moulines, E. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Ta\cs 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Keskin, N. B. and Zeevi, A. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Ban, G.-Y. and Keskin, N. B. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Fu, M. C. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Kim, S. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Pasupathy, R. and Kim, S. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Kushner, H. J. and Yin, G. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Gao, Siyang and Du, Jianzhong and Chen, Chun-Hung 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Chen, Y. and Ryzhov, I. O. (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 George, A. P. and Powell, W. B. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Broadie, M. and Cicek, D. and Zeevi, A. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Schaul, T. and Zhang, S. and LeCun, Y. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 Agrawal, S. and Goyal, N. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Shiryaev, A. N. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.