← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace-2cm
Florian Gunsilius, David Van Dijcke
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14630
212
Citation mentions
130
Cited references
11
Sections
7,554
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Caroccia, Marco and Chambolle, Antonin and Slep\vc 2020 6 4 9.0 0.028 1.000 100%
2 Chambolle, Antonin and Pock, Thomas 2021 6 3 11.0 0.028 1.000 100%
3 Politis, Dimitris N and Romano, Joseph P and Wolf,... 1999 6 6 11.0 0.028 1.000 100%
4 Ambrosio, Luigi and Nicola Fusco and Diego Pallara 2000 19 7 38.0 0.090 1.000 100%
5 Pock, Thomas and Cremers, Daniel and Bischof, Hors... 2009 7 4 14.0 0.033 1.000 100%
6 Strekalovskiy, Evgeny and Chambolle, Antonin and C... 2012 4 4 7.0 0.019 0.928 100%
7 Chambolle, Antonin and Pock, Thomas 2011 4 3 7.0 0.019 0.928 100%
8 Irle, A 1997 7 2 14.0 0.033 0.874 100%
9 Lucas, Charles-Ge 2022 3 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 100%
10 Lei, Jing and G’Sell, Max and Rinaldo, Alessandro ... 2018 4 2 8.0 0.019 0.811 100%
11 Richardson, Thomas J 1992 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
12 Dal Maso, Gianni 2012 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
13 Mattila, Pertti 1999 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
14 Ramani, Sathish and Blu, Thierry and Unser, Michae... 2008 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
15 Mumford, David Bryant and Shah, Jayant 1989 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
16 Chan, Tony F and Shen, Jianhong 2005 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
17 Alberti, Giovanni and Bouchitte 2003 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
18 Ruf, Matthias 2019 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
19 Morini, Massimiliano 2002 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
20 Hu 2016 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
21 Quelch, John 2009 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
22 Frias-Martinez, Vanessa and Virseda, Jesus 2012 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
23 Mollenhoff, Thomas and Cremers, Daniel 2017 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
24 Evans, Lawrence C and Gariepy, Ronald F 2018 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
25 Bosq, Denis 2012 4 1 8.0 0.019 0.644 100%
26 Aue, Alexander and Ho 2009 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
27 Park, Chiwoo 2022 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
28 Zhu, Hongtu and Fan, Jianqing and Kong, Linglong 2014 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
29 Madrid Padilla, Carlos Misael and Wang, Daren and ... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
30 Aliprantis, Charalambos D and Kim C Border 2006 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
31 Argyle, Bronson S and Nadauld, Taylor D and Palmer... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
32 Brunner, Eric J and Dougherty, Shaun M and Ross, S... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
33 Kuo, RJ and Ho, LM and Hu, Clark M 2002 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
34 Li, Lihong and Chu, Wei and Langford, John and Sch... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Lamberson, PJ and Page, Scott E 2012 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Card, David and Mas, Alexandre and Rothstein, Jess... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Scheffer, Marten and Bascompte, Jordi and Brock, W... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Hansen, Bruce E 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Caetano, Gregorio and Maheshri, Vikram 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Chen, Hao and Li, Dongshunyi and Bar-Joseph, Ziv 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Hou, Wenpin and Ji, Zhicheng and Chen, Zeyu and Wh... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Geman, Stuart and Geman, Donald 1984 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Canny, John 1986 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Kass, Michael and Witkin, Andrew and Terzopoulos, ... 1988 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Wang, Li-Lian and Shi, Yuying and Tai, Xue-Cheng 2012 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Chan, Tony F and Vese, Luminita A 2001 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Garc\'\i 2016 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Garc\'\i 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Hu, Addison J and Green, Alden and Tibshirani, Rya... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Page, Ewan S 1954 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Mu 1992 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Braun, Jerome V and Braun, RK and Mu 2000 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Killick, Rebecca and Fearnhead, Paul and Eckley, I... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Porter, Jack and Yu, Ping 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Donoho, David L and Johnstone, Iain M 1994 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Harchaoui, Zaid and Moulines, Eric and Bach, Franc... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Andrews, Donald WK 1993 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Bai, Jushan and Perron, Pierre 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Delgado, Miguel A and Hidalgo, Javier 2000 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Herlands, William and Neill, Daniel B and Nickisch... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Herlands, William and McFowland III, Edward and Wi... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Cheng, Alden 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Narita, Yusuke and Yata, Kohei 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Abdulkad\.\i 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Cattaneo, Matias D and Titiunik, Rocio 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Keele, Luke J and Titiunik, Rocio 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Qiu, Peihua and Yandell, Brian 1997 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Korostelev, Aleksandr Petrovich and Tsybakov, Alex... 1993 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 O'Sullivan, Finbarr and Qian, Maijian 1994 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Muller, Hans-Georg and Song, Kai-Sheng 1994 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Donoho, David L 1999 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Li, Meng and Ghosal, Subhashis 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Qiu, Peihua 1998 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Tibshirani, Robert and Saunders, Michael and Rosse... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Rinaldo, Alessandro 2009 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Harchaoui, Za\i 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Matteson, David S and James, Nicholas A 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Fryzlewicz, Piotr 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Kova 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Dubey, Paromita and Mu 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Horva 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Madrid Padilla, Carlos Misael and Xu, Haotian and ... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Brown, Ethan S and Chan, Tony F and Bresson, Xavie... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Pock, Thomas and Cremers, Daniel and Bischof, Hors... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
85 Chambolle, Antonin and Tan, Pauline and Vaiter, Sa... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
86 Camilli, Fabio 1999 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
87 Strekalovskiy, Evgeny and Cremers, Daniel 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
88 Stein, Charles M 1981 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
89 Rosson, Zach and Anthonio, Felicia and Tackett, Ca... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
90 Software Freedom Law Center 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
91 Human Rights Watch 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
92 Purohit, Dishank 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
93 Mishra, Anandita 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
94 Yeung, Jessie and Gupta, Swati and Jha, Meenketan 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
95 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
96 The Economist 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
97 Mashal, Mujib and Kumar, Hari 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
98 The Times of India 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
99 Kathuria, Rajat and Kedia, Mansi and Varma, Ganges... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
100 West, Darrell M 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
101 Top10VPN 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
102 Ro 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
103 Jensen, Robert 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
104 Bjo 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
105 Couture, Victor and Faber, Benjamin and Gu, Yizhen... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
106 Zuo, George W 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
107 Hjort, Jonas and Poulsen, Jonas 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
108 Goldfarb, Avi and Tucker, Catherine 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
109 CISA n.d. 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
110 \vS 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
111 Kung, Kevin S and Greco, Kael and Sobolevsky, Stan... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
112 Eagle, Nathan and Macy, Michael and Claxton, Rob 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
113 Blumenstock, Joshua and Cadamuro, Gabriel and On, ... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
114 Naef, Ed and Muelbert, Philipp and Raza, Syed and ... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
115 World Bank Group 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
116 Kreindler, Gabriel E and Miyauchi, Yuhei 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
117 Van Dijcke, David and Wright, Austin L and Polyak,... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
118 Bhaduri, Ayshee 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
119 Woloszko, Nicolas 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
120 Dong, Lei and Chen, Sicong and Cheng, Yunsheng and... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
121 Spelta, Alessandro and Pagnottoni, Paolo 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
122 United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
123 Android Authority 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
124 Statcounter 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
125 Giovanni Alberti and Guy Bouchitte 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
126 Federer, Herbert 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
127 van der Vaart, Aad W and Wellner, Jon A 1996 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
128 White, Halbert 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
129 Bauer, Michael 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
130 McKelvey, JP 1984 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.