Citation Analysis – \bf Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional Densities by Generalized Random Forests

\bf Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional Densities by Generalized Random Forests
Federico Zincenko
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13251

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,581

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Athey, S. and Tibshirani, J. and Wager, S.	2019	16	5	26.0	0.182	1.000	100%
2	Wu, X.	2010	6	5	8.5	0.068	0.941	83%
3	Wager, S. and S. Athey	2018	13	4	17.0	0.148	0.885	69%
4	Barron, A. R. and C. Sheu	1991	11	4	11.0	0.125	0.769	45%
5	R. A. Vitale	1992	4	3	4.0	0.045	0.737	50%
6	Breiman, L.	2001	2	2	4.0	0.023	0.644	100%
7	A. W. van der Vaart	1998	2	2	2.5	0.023	0.511	50%
8	Shao, J. and Wu, C. F. J.	1989	2	2	2.5	0.023	0.511	50%
9	Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J.	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
10	Hansen, B. E.	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
11	Zincenko, F. (self)	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
12	Bajari, P. and Nekipelov, D. and Ryan, S. P. and Y...	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
13	Asher, S. and Nekipelov, D. and Novosad, P. and Ry...	2016	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
14	Matzkin, R. L.	2003	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
15	Matzkin, R. L.	2007	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
16	Matzkin, R. L.	2008	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
17	Matzkin, R. L.	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
18	Athey, S. and P. A. Haile	2007	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Perrigne, I. and Q. Vuong	2021	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	P. Hall and J. Racine and Q. Li	2004	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	S. Efromovich	2007	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	W. Shen and S. Ghosal	2016	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	A. Norets and D. Pati	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	A. Norets and J. Pelenis	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Cattaneo, M. D. and Chandak, R. and Jansson, M. an...	2024	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	J. Mourtada and S. Ga\"\i	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	M. D. Cattaneo and J. M. Klusowski and W. G. Under...	2024	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Dalmasso, N. and Pospisil, T. and Lee, A. B. and I...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Gao, Z. and Hastie, T.	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Chen, X.	2007	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Chen, X. and K. Kato	2019	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Mentch, L. and Hooker, G.	2016	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Sexton, J. and Laake, P.	2009	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Schmid, L. and Gerharz, A. and Groll, A. and Pauly...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	T. Xu and R. Zhu and X. Shao	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Korostelev, A. P. and A. B. Tsybakov	1993	2	1	1.0	0.023	0.110	0%
37	Song, Y. and X. Chen and K. Kato	2019	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.087	0%
38	Hoeffding, W.	1948	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.087	0%
39	Liu, N. and Y. Luo	2017	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Athey, S. and Tibshirani, J. and Wager, S.

2019

26.0

0.182

1.000

100%

Wu, X.

2010

8.5

0.068

0.941

83%

Wager, S. and S. Athey

2018

17.0

0.148

0.885

69%

Barron, A. R. and C. Sheu

1991

11.0

0.125

0.769

45%

R. A. Vitale

1992

4.0

0.045

0.737

50%

Breiman, L.

2001

4.0

0.023

0.644

100%

A. W. van der Vaart

1998

2.5

0.023

0.511

50%

Shao, J. and Wu, C. F. J.

1989

2.5

0.023

0.511

50%

Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J.

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hansen, B. E.

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zincenko, F. (self)

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Bajari, P. and Nekipelov, D. and Ryan, S. P. and Y...

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Asher, S. and Nekipelov, D. and Novosad, P. and Ry...

2016

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Matzkin, R. L.

2003

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Matzkin, R. L.

2007

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Matzkin, R. L.

2008

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Matzkin, R. L.

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Athey, S. and P. A. Haile

2007

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Perrigne, I. and Q. Vuong

2021

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

P. Hall and J. Racine and Q. Li

2004

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

S. Efromovich

2007

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

W. Shen and S. Ghosal

2016

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

A. Norets and D. Pati

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

A. Norets and J. Pelenis

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Cattaneo, M. D. and Chandak, R. and Jansson, M. an...

2024

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

J. Mourtada and S. Ga\"\i

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

M. D. Cattaneo and J. M. Klusowski and W. G. Under...

2024

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dalmasso, N. and Pospisil, T. and Lee, A. B. and I...

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Gao, Z. and Hastie, T.

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chen, X.

2007

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chen, X. and K. Kato

2019

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Mentch, L. and Hooker, G.

2016

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Sexton, J. and Laake, P.

2009

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Schmid, L. and Gerharz, A. and Groll, A. and Pauly...

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

T. Xu and R. Zhu and X. Shao

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Korostelev, A. P. and A. B. Tsybakov

1993

1.0

0.023

0.110

Song, Y. and X. Chen and K. Kato

2019

0.5

0.011

0.087

Hoeffding, W.

1948

0.5

0.011

0.087

Liu, N. and Y. Luo

2017

0.5

0.011

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.