Citation Analysis

Correcting Sample Selection Bias in PISA Rankings
Onil Boussim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10642
15
Citation mentions
14
Cited references
10
Sections
3,475
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ringarp, Johanna 2016 2 1 2.0 0.133 0.511 100%
2 Nagy, Philip 1996 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
3 Martin, Michael O and others 2000 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
4 McEwan, Patrick J and Marshall, Jeffery H 2004 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
5 Cromley, Jennifer G 2009 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
6 Tienken, Christopher H 2008 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
7 McGaw, Barry 2008 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
8 Jakubowski, Maciej and Pokropek, Artur 2015 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
9 Knodel, Philipp and Martens, Kerstin and Niemann, ... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
10 Knighton, Tamara and Brochu, Pierre and Gluszynski... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
11 Stray, Janicke Heldal and Wood, Bronwyn 2020 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
12 Yildiz Suleyman 2020 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
13 Heckman, James J 1979 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
14 Vella, Francis 1998 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.