Citation Analysis – \bf Bounds on Average Effects in \\ Discrete Choice Panel Data Models

\bf Bounds on Average Effects in \\ Discrete Choice Panel Data Models
Cavit Pakel, Martin Weidner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09299

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,359

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern\'andez-Val, J. Hahn, and...	2013	11	9	21.0	0.134	1.000	100%
2	Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and L. Laage	2021	5	3	8.0	0.061	1.000	100%
3	Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, K. i. Kim, and T. M. Russell	2024	3	3	5.0	0.037	0.843	100%
4	Bonhomme, S	2012	3	3	5.0	0.037	0.843	100%
5	Browning, M. and J. M. Carro	2010	3	3	5.0	0.037	0.843	100%
6	Browning, M. and J. M. Carro	2014	3	3	5.0	0.037	0.843	100%
7	Aguirregabiria, V. and J. M. Carro	2021	3	2	4.0	0.037	0.737	100%
8			2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
9	Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner (self)	2020	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
10	Browning, M. and J. M. Carro	2007	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
11	Browning, M. and J. M. Carro	2013	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
12	Stoye, J	2020	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
13	Liu, L., A. Poirier, and J.-L. Shiu	2021	2	1	2.0	0.024	0.511	100%
14	Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and F. Windmeijer	2002	2	1	2.0	0.024	0.511	100%
15	Imbens, G. and C. F. Manski	2004	2	1	4.0	0.024	0.511	100%
16			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
17			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
18			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
19			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
20			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
21			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
22			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
23			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
24			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
25			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
26	Abrevaya, J. and Y.-C. Hsu	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
27	Honore, B. E. and E. T. Tamer	2006	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
28	Botosaru, I. and C. Muris	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
29	Botosaru, I., C. Muris, and S. Sokullu	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
30	Chen, X., E. T. Tamer, and A. Torgovitsky	2011	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
31			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
32			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
33			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
34	Lancaster, T	2000	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
35	Das, M. and A. van Soest	1999	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
36	Baetschmann, G., K. E. Staub, and R. Winkelmann	2015	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
37	Muris, C	2017	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
38	Kitazawa, Y	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
39	Honore, B. E., C. Muris, and M. Weidner (self)	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
40			1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
41	Bartolucci, F. and V. Nigro	2010	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
42			1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
43	Arellano, M	2003	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
44			1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
45	Hyslop, D. R	1999	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
46	Cruz-Gonzalez, M., I. Fernandez-Val, and M. Weidne... (self)	2017	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
47	Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans	2015	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
48	Bentkus, V. and F. G\"otze	1996	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
49			1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
50	Davezies, L., X. D’Haultfoeuille, C. Gaillac, L. L...	2024	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern\'andez-Val, J. Hahn, and...

2013

21.0

0.134

1.000

100%

Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and L. Laage

2021

8.0

0.061

1.000

100%

Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, K. i. Kim, and T. M. Russell

2024

5.0

0.037

0.843

100%

Bonhomme, S

2012

5.0

0.037

0.843

100%

Browning, M. and J. M. Carro

2010

5.0

0.037

0.843

100%

Browning, M. and J. M. Carro

2014

5.0

0.037

0.843

100%

Aguirregabiria, V. and J. M. Carro

2021

4.0

0.037

0.737

100%

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner (self)

2020

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Browning, M. and J. M. Carro

2007

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Browning, M. and J. M. Carro

2013

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Stoye, J

2020

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Liu, L., A. Poirier, and J.-L. Shiu

2021

2.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and F. Windmeijer

2002

2.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Imbens, G. and C. F. Manski

2004

4.0

0.024

0.511

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Abrevaya, J. and Y.-C. Hsu

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Honore, B. E. and E. T. Tamer

2006

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Botosaru, I. and C. Muris

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Botosaru, I., C. Muris, and S. Sokullu

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Chen, X., E. T. Tamer, and A. Torgovitsky

2011

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Lancaster, T

2000

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Das, M. and A. van Soest

1999

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Baetschmann, G., K. E. Staub, and R. Winkelmann

2015

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Muris, C

2017

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Kitazawa, Y

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Honore, B. E., C. Muris, and M. Weidner (self)

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Bartolucci, F. and V. Nigro

2010

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Arellano, M

2003

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hyslop, D. R

1999

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Cruz-Gonzalez, M., I. Fernandez-Val, and M. Weidne... (self)

2017

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans

2015

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Bentkus, V. and F. G\"otze

1996

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Davezies, L., X. D’Haultfoeuille, C. Gaillac, L. L...

2024

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.