← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2309.08808
Jinglong Zhao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08808
241
Citation mentions
138
Cited references
15
Sections
9,257
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hahn J, Hirano K, Karlan D 2011 7 4 10.5 0.029 1.000 100%
2 Antos A, Grover V, Szepesvari C 2010 8 7 12.0 0.033 1.000 100%
3 Carpentier A, Munos R 2011 9 8 14.0 0.037 1.000 100%
4 Grover V 2009 8 7 12.0 0.033 1.000 100%
5 Chen Y, Lu J 2025 8 6 13.0 0.033 1.000 100%
6 Khamaru K, Zhang CH 2024 9 6 15.0 0.037 1.000 100%
7 Xiong R, Athey S, Bayati M, Imbens GW 2019 6 4 9.0 0.025 1.000 100%
8 Lattimore T, Szepesvari C 2020 4 4 6.5 0.017 0.928 100%
9 Melfi VF, Page C 2000 4 3 6.5 0.017 0.928 100%
10 Shin J, Ramdas A, Rinaldo A 4 4 6.5 0.017 0.928 100%
11 Neyman J 1934 5 2 7.0 0.021 0.874 100%
12 Hu F, Zhang LX 2004 6 2 9.0 0.025 0.874 100%
13 Mete B 2022 3 3 5.0 0.012 0.843 100%
14 Slivkins A 2019 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
15 Hirano K, Porter JR 2023 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
16 Nie X, Tian X, Taylor J, Zou J 2018 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
17 Offer-Westort M, Coppock A, Green DP 2021 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
18 Shin J, Ramdas A, Rinaldo A 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
19 Zhang K, Janson L, Murphy S 2020 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
20 Zhang K, Janson L, Murphy S 2021 3 3 4.5 0.012 0.843 100%
21 Imbens GW, Rubin DB 2015 3 2 4.0 0.012 0.737 100%
22 Li HH, Owen AB 2024 3 2 4.5 0.012 0.737 100%
23 Brown BM 1971 3 2 6.0 0.012 0.737 100%
24 Armstrong TB 2022 2 2 1.5 0.008 0.644 100%
25 Russac Y, Katsimerou C, Bohle D, Cappe O, Garivier... 2021 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
26 Lai TL, Robbins H 1985 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
27 Robbins H 1952 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
28 Bowden J, Trippa L 2017 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
29 Hadad V, Hirshberg DA, Zhan R, Wager S, Athey S 2021 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
30 Zhan R, Hadad V, Hirshberg DA, Athey S 2021 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
31 Zhan R, Ren Z, Athey S, Zhou Z 2023 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
32 Perchet V, Rigollet P, Chassang S, Snowberg E 2016 2 2 4.0 0.008 0.644 100%
33 Ross SM 2013 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
34 Aznag A, Cummings R, Elmachtoub AN 2023 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
35 Adusumilli K 2022 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
36 Kato M, Ariu K, Imaizumi M, Uehara M, Nomura M, Qi... 2022 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
37 Wu CF 1981 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
38 Gut A 2009 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
39 Cox DR, Reid N 2000 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
40 Fisher RA 1936 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
41 Wu CJ, Hamada MS 2011 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
42 Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W 2002 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
43 Deaton A, Cartwright N 2018 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
44 Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kremer M 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
45 Karlan DS, Zinman J 2008 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
46 Mosleh M, Martel C, Eckles D, Rand DG 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
47 Berry DA 2006 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
48 Hu F, Rosenberger WF 2003 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
49 Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM 2015 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
50 Rossi PE, Allenby GM 2003 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
51 Sandor Z, Wedel M 2001 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
52 Bakshy E, Eckles D, Bernstein MS 2014 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
53 Deng A, Xu Y, Kohavi R, Walker T 2013 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
54 Kohavi R, Longbotham R 2017 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
55 Hahn J 1998 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
56 Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G 2003 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
57 Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP 1994 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
58 Robins JM, Rotnitzky A 1995 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
59 Scharfstein DO, Rotnitzky A, Robins JM 1999 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
60 Ding P 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
61 Wager S 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
62 Etore P, Jourdain B 2010 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
63 Etore P, Fort G, Jourdain B, Moulines E 2011 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
64 Dai J, Gradu P, Harshaw C 2023 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
65 Chen X, Jasin S, Shi C 2022 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
66 Russo DJ, Van Roy B, Kazerouni A, Osband I, Wen Z,... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
67 Agrawal S, Goyal N 2012 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
68 Audibert JY, Munos R, Szepesvari C 2009 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
69 Auer P, Cesa-Bianchi N, Fischer P 2002 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
70 Garivier A, Cappe O 2011 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
71 Russo D, Van Roy B 2016 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
72 Simchi-Levi D, Wang C 2023 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
73 Thompson WR 1933 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
74 Hu F, Rosenberger WF 2006 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
75 Jennison C, Turnbull BW 1999 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
76 Sverdlov O 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
77 Efron B 1971 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
78 Wei L 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
79 Wei L 1979 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
80 Eisele JR 1990 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
81 Eisele JR 1994 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
82 Eisele JR, Woodroofe MB 1995 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
83 Wei LJ 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
84 Azriel D, Feigin PD 2014 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
85 Melfi V, Page C 1998 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
86 Rosenberger WF, Stallard N, Ivanova A, Harper CN, ... 2001 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
87 Blackwell M, Pashley NE, Valentino D 2022 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
88 Cai Y, Rafi A 2024 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
89 Cytrynbaum M 2021 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
90 Tabord-Meehan M 2023 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
91 Wei W, Ma X, Wang J 2025 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
92 Deshpande Y, Mackey L, Syrgkanis V, Taddy M 2018 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
93 Deshpande Y, Javanmard A, Mehrabi M 2019 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
94 Bechhofer RE 1954 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
95 Chick SE, Inoue K 2001 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
96 Glynn P, Juneja S 2004 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
97 Hong LJ, Fan W, Luo J 2021 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
98 Hunter SR, Nelson BL 2017 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
99 Chen CH 1996 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
100 Chen CH, Lin J, Yucesan E, Chick SE 2000 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
101 Audibert JY, Bubeck S, Munos R 2010 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
102 Kasy M, Sautmann A 2021 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
103 Mannor S, Tsitsiklis JN 2004 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
104 Russo D 2016 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
105 Wager S, Xu K 2021 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
106 Rubin DB 1974 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
107 Holland PW 1986 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
108 Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM 2020 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
109 Borodin A, El-Yaniv R 2005 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
110 Buchbinder N, Naor JS, et al 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
111 Berger JO 2013 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
112 Bickel PJ, Doksum KA 2015 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
113 Li KC 1983 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
114 Manski CF 2004 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
115 Stoye J 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
116 Bojinov I, Simchi-Levi D, Zhao J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
117 Ni T, Bojinov I, Zhao J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
118 Bai Y 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
119 Basse GW, Ding Y, Toulis P 2023 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
120 Bai Y 2022 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
121 Candogan O, Chen C, Niazadeh R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
122 Greevy R, Lu B, Silber JH, Rosenbaum P 2004 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
123 Harshaw C, Savje F, Spielman D, Zhang P 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
124 Lu B, Greevy R, Xu X, Beck C 2011 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
125 Rosenbaum PR 1989 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
126 Zhao J, Zhou Z 2022 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
127 Gibson E, Deo S, Jonasson JO, Kachule M, Palamount... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
128 Abadie A, Zhao J 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
129 Doudchenko N, Khosravi K, Pouget-Abadie J, Lahaie ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
130 Asmussen S, Glynn PW 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
131 Glasserman P 2004 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
132 Fan L, Glynn PW 2024 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
133 Kalvit A, Zeevi A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
134 Boucheron S, Lugosi G, Massart P 2013 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
135 McDiarmid C, et al 1989 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
136 Badanidiyuru A, Kleinberg R, Slivkins A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
137 Arlotto A, Gurvich I 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
138 Bretagnolle J, Huber C 1979 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.