← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\Large Structural Econometric Estimation of the Basic Reproduction Number for Covid-19 Across U.S. States and Selected Countries
Ida Johnsson, M. Hashem Pesaran, Cynthia Fan Yang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08619
57
Citation mentions
32
Cited references
5
Sections
2,897
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Katul, G. G., A. Mrad, S. Bonetti, G. Manoli, and ... 2020 4 2 3.0 0.070 0.811 100%
2 Chudik, A., M. H. Pesaran, and A. Rebucci (self) 2022 4 2 3.5 0.070 0.811 100%
3 Korolev, I 2021 3 2 2.0 0.053 0.737 100%
4 Fernandez-Villaverde, J. and C. I. Jones 2022 3 2 2.0 0.053 0.737 100%
5 Ke, R., E. Romero-Severson, S. Sanche, and N. Heng... 2021 3 2 2.0 0.053 0.737 100%
6 Pesaran, M. H. and C. F. Yang (self) 2022 4 1 8.0 0.070 0.644 100%
7 White, L. F., C. B. Moser, R. N. Thompson, and M. ... 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
8 Buckman, S. R., R. Glick, K. J. Lansing, N. Petros... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
9 Wu, J. T., K. Leung, and G. M. Leung 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
10 Arias, J. E., J. Fern\'andez-Villaverde, J. F. Rub... 2023 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
11 Li, Q., X. Guan, P. Wu, X. Wang, L. Zhou, Y. Tong,... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
12 Liu, T., J. Hu, J. Xiao, G. He, M. Kang, Z. Rong, ... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
13 Sanche, S., Y. T. Lin, C. Xu, E. Romero-Severson, ... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
14 Zhao, S., Q. Lin, J. Ran, S. S. Musa, G. Yang, W. ... (self) 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
15 Alimohamadi, Y., M. Taghdir, and M. Sepandi 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
16 Liu, Y., A. A. Gayle, A. Wilder-Smith, and J. Rock... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.035 0.511 100%
17 Del Valle, S. Y., J. M. Hyman, and N. Chitnis 2013 1 1 1.0 0.018 0.406 100%
18 Fraser, C 2007 1 1 1.0 0.018 0.406 100%
19 Delamater, P. L., E. J. Street, T. F. Leslie, Y. T... (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.018 0.406 100%
20 Lessler, J. and D. A. T. Cummings 2016 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
21 Tang, L., Y. Zhou, L. Wang, S. Purkayastha, L. Zha... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
22 Atkeson, A., K. A. Kopecky, and T. A. Zha 2023 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
23 Obadia, T., R. Haneef, and P.-Y. Boelle 2012 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
24 Wallinga, J. and M. Lipsitch 2007 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
25 Bettencourt, L. M. A. and R. M. Ribeiro 2008 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
26 White, L. F. and M. Pagano 2008 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
27 Locatelli, I., B. Trachsel, and V. Rousson 2021 1 1 0.5 0.018 0.406 100%
28 Hale, T., N. Angrist, B. Kira, A. Petherick, T. Ph... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.018 0.406 100%
29 Hodcroft, E. B 2021 1 1 2.0 0.018 0.406 100%
30 Gibbons, C. L., M.-J. J. Mangen, D. Plass, A. H. H... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.018 0.406 100%
31 Newey, W. K. and K. D. West 1987 1 1 2.0 0.018 0.406 100%
32 Driscoll, J. C. and A. C. Kraay 1998 1 1 2.0 0.018 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.