← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\LARGE \textbfNon-linear dimension reduction in factor-augmented vector autoregressions
Karin Klieber
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04821
148
Citation mentions
88
Cited references
9
Sections
9,134
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bernanke et al. 2005 8 4 14.0 0.054 1.000 100%
2 Jurado et al. 2015 5 3 9.0 0.034 1.000 100%
3 McCracken and Ng 2020 6 4 12.0 0.041 1.000 100%
4 Boivin et al. 2009 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
5 Giannone et al. 2015 3 3 6.0 0.020 0.843 100%
6 Dixon and Polson 2019 4 2 6.0 0.027 0.811 100%
7 Andreini et al. 2020 4 2 6.0 0.027 0.811 100%
8 Roweis and Saul 2000 4 2 6.0 0.027 0.811 100%
9 Huber et al. 2020 3 2 4.0 0.020 0.737 100%
10 Feng et al. 2018 3 2 4.0 0.020 0.737 100%
11 Goodfellow et al. 2016 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
12 Christiano et al. 2005 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
13 Stock and Watson 2005 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
14 Bloom 2009 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
15 Carriero et al. 2015 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
16 Korobilis 2013 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Heaton et al. 2017 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Kelly et al. 2018 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
19 Koop and Korobilis 2014 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
20 Baker et al. 2016 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
21 Carriero et al. 2018 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
22 Carriero et al. 2021 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
23 Doan et al. 1984 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
24 Sims and Zha 1998 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
25 He et al. 2005 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
26 Shapley 1953 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
27 Lundberg and Lee 2017 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
28 Lenza and Primiceri 2020 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
29 Schorfheide and Song 2020 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
30 Cascaldi-Garcia 2022 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
31 Hornik et al. 1989 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
32 Cabanilla and Go 2019 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
33 Carriero et al. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Primiceri and Tambalotti 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Ng 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Hauzenberger et al. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Feng et al. 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Wang et al. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Ellis et al. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Eickmeier et al. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Huber and Fischer 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Heaton 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Gallant and White 1992 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Chakraborty and Joseph 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Mullainathan and Spiess 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Coulombe et al. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Coulombe 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Bengio et al. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Bank et al. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Stock and Watson 2002 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Kayo 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Farrell et al. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Hauzenberger et al. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Hornik 1991 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Glorot et al. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Crawford et al. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Crawford et al. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Theodoridis 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 King et al. 1991 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Pagan and Pesaran 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Uhlig 2005 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Baumeister and Hamilton 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Ahmadi and Uhlig 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Antol\'\in-D\'\iaz and Rubio-Ram\'\irez 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Rigobon 2003 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 Lanne and Lutkepohl 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 Lanne and Lutkepohl 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 Lutkepohl and Wo\'zniak 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
69 Mertens and Ravn 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
70 Gertler and Karadi 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
71 Angelini and Fanelli 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
72 Kilian and Lutkepohl 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
73 Kastner and Fruhwirth-Schnatter 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
74 Gneiting and Raftery 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
75 Damjanovic and Masten 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
76 Potjagailo 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
77 Lombardi and Zhu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
78 Wu and Xia 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
79 Stock and Watson 1989 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
80 Marcellino 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
81 Carriero et al. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
82 Carriero et al. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
83 Strumbelj and Kononenko 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
84 Joseph et al. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
85 Borup et al. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
86 Bluwstein et al. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
87 Coulombe and Goebel 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
88 Covert and Lee 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.