Citation Analysis – Instrumental variable estimation of the proportional hazards model by presmoothing

Instrumental variable estimation of the proportional hazards model by presmoothing
Lorenzo Tedesco, Jad Beyhum, Ingrid Van Keilegom
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02183

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,036

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C	2005	11	5	17.0	0.164	0.969	91%
2	Cox, D. R	1972	4	3	5.0	0.060	0.843	75%
3	Beran, R	1981	3	3	5.0	0.045	0.843	100%
4	Beyhum, J., Florens, J.-P., and Van Keilegom, I (self)	2022	4	3	3.0	0.060	0.737	50%
5	Tsiatis, A. A	1981	3	3	4.5	0.045	0.737	67%
6	Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C	2006	2	1	2.0	0.030	0.511	100%
7	Koenker, R., Chernozhukov, V., He, X., and Peng, L	2017	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
8	Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B	1996	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
9	Wuthrich, K	2020	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
10	Kaplan, D. M. and Sun, Y	2017	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
11	Kaido, H. and Wuthrich, K	2021	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
12	Wuthrich, K	2019	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
13	Cristobal, J. C., Roca, P. F., and González Mantei...	1987	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
14	Akritas, M. G	1996	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
15	Musta, E., Patilea, V., and Van Keilegom, I (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
16	Bijwaard, G. E. and Ridder, G	2005	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
17	Wang, L., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E., Martinussen, T., ...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
18	Hong, H. and Tamer, E	2003	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
19	Chen, S	2018	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
20	Wang, Q. and Chen, S	2021	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
21	Beyhum, J., Tedesco, L., and Van Keilegom, I (self)		1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
22	Beyhum, J., Centorrino, S., Florens, J.-P., and Va... (self)	2023a	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
23	Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., and Farrell, M. H	2019	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
24	Giacomini, R., Politis, D. N., and White, H	2013	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
25	Woodbury, S. A. and Spiegelman, R. G	1987	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
26	Chen, X., Linton, O., and Van Keilegom, I (self)	2003	4	2	2.0	0.060	0.175	0%
27	Van Keilegom, I (self)	1998	5	1	2.5	0.075	0.149	0%
28	Van Keilegom, I. and Veraverbeke, N (self)	1996	2	2	1.0	0.030	0.139	0%
29	Van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A	1996	4	1	2.0	0.060	0.139	0%
30	De Backer, M., El Ghouch, A., and Van Keilegom, I (self)	2020	2	1	1.0	0.030	0.110	0%
31	Van Keilegom, I. and Veraverbeke, N (self)	1997	2	1	1.0	0.030	0.110	0%
32	Akritas, M. G. and Van Keilegom, I (self)	2001	1	1	0.5	0.015	0.087	0%
33	Hall, P., Wolff, R. C., and Yao, Q	1999	1	1	0.5	0.015	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C

2005

17.0

0.164

0.969

91%

Cox, D. R

1972

5.0

0.060

0.843

75%

Beran, R

1981

5.0

0.045

0.843

100%

Beyhum, J., Florens, J.-P., and Van Keilegom, I (self)

2022

3.0

0.060

0.737

50%

Tsiatis, A. A

1981

4.5

0.045

0.737

67%

Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C

2006

2.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Koenker, R., Chernozhukov, V., He, X., and Peng, L

2017

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B

1996

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Wuthrich, K

2020

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Kaplan, D. M. and Sun, Y

2017

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Kaido, H. and Wuthrich, K

2021

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Wuthrich, K

2019

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Cristobal, J. C., Roca, P. F., and González Mantei...

1987

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Akritas, M. G

1996

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Musta, E., Patilea, V., and Van Keilegom, I (self)

2022

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Bijwaard, G. E. and Ridder, G

2005

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Wang, L., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E., Martinussen, T., ...

2023

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Hong, H. and Tamer, E

2003

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Chen, S

2018

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Wang, Q. and Chen, S

2021

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Beyhum, J., Tedesco, L., and Van Keilegom, I (self)

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Beyhum, J., Centorrino, S., Florens, J.-P., and Va... (self)

2023a

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., and Farrell, M. H

2019

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Giacomini, R., Politis, D. N., and White, H

2013

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Woodbury, S. A. and Spiegelman, R. G

1987

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Chen, X., Linton, O., and Van Keilegom, I (self)

2003

2.0

0.060

0.175

Van Keilegom, I (self)

1998

2.5

0.075

0.149

Van Keilegom, I. and Veraverbeke, N (self)

1996

1.0

0.030

0.139

Van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A

1996

2.0

0.060

0.139

De Backer, M., El Ghouch, A., and Van Keilegom, I (self)

2020

1.0

0.030

0.110

Van Keilegom, I. and Veraverbeke, N (self)

1997

1.0

0.030

0.110

Akritas, M. G. and Van Keilegom, I (self)

2001

0.5

0.015

0.087

Hall, P., Wolff, R. C., and Yao, Q

1999

0.5

0.015

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.