Citation Analysis

On the use of U-statistics for linear dyadic interaction models
G. M. Szini
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02089
74
Citation mentions
22
Cited references
12
Sections
10,476
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Charbonneau, Karyne B 2017 9 5 16.0 0.122 1.000 100%
2 Jochmans, Koen 2018 11 6 19.0 0.149 0.969 91%
3 Serfling, Robert J 2009 10 7 18.0 0.135 0.966 90%
4 Graham, Bryan S 2019 4 3 5.0 0.054 0.928 100%
5 Graham, Bryan S 2017 12 9 17.5 0.162 0.874 67%
6 Graham, Bryan S 2020 4 2 7.0 0.054 0.811 100%
7 Ferna 2016 4 2 6.0 0.054 0.811 100%
8 Hoeffding, Wassily and Robbins, Herbert and others 1948 4 4 5.0 0.054 0.737 50%
9 Jochmans, Koen 2017 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
10 Tinbergen, Jan 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
11 Jackson, Matthew O and Lo 2013 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
12 Juodis, A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Silva, JMC Santos and Tenreyro, Silvana 2006 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Neyman, Jerzy and Scott, Elizabeth L 1948 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Van der Vaart, Aad W 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Anderson, James E and Van Wincoop, Eric 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Shalizi, C.R 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Dzemski, Andreas 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Chen, Mingli and Ferna 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Rao, BLS Prakasa 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Menzel, KONRAD 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Ferguson, Thomas S and Shapley, LS and MacQueen, J... 2005 2 1 1.0 0.027 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.