Citation Analysis

Generalized Information Criteria for Structured Sparse Models
Eduardo F. Mendes, Gabriel J. P. Pinto
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01764
75
Citation mentions
35
Cited references
5
Sections
4,545
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Martin J. Wainwright 2019 14 9 28.0 0.187 1.000 100%
2 Kim, Yongdai and Jeon, Jong-June 2016 6 4 9.0 0.080 1.000 100%
3 Negahban, Sahand N and Ravikumar, Pradeep and Wain... 2012 11 6 22.0 0.147 1.000 100%
4 Chen, Jiahua and Chen, Zehua 2012 3 2 3.0 0.040 0.737 100%
5 Bu 2011 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
6 Wang, Hansheng and Li, Bo and Leng, Chenlei 2009 3 1 1.5 0.040 0.585 100%
7 She, Yiyuan and Tran, Hoang 2019 3 1 1.5 0.040 0.585 100%
8 Zhang, Yongli and Shen, Xiaotong 2010 3 1 1.5 0.040 0.585 100%
9 Chen, Jiahua and Chen, Zehua 2008 2 1 1.0 0.027 0.511 100%
10 Gao, Xin and X-K Song 2010 2 1 1.0 0.027 0.511 100%
11 Recht, Benjamin and Fazel, Maryam and Parrilo, Pab... 2010 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
12 Tibshirani, Robert and Wainwright, Martin and Hast... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
13 H. Akaike 1974 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
14 Stone, Mervyn 1974 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Craven, Peter and Wahba, Grace 1978 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Schwarz, Gideon 1978 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Broman, Karl W and Speed, Terence P 2002 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Casella, George and Giro 2009 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Zhang, Yiyun and Li, Runze and Tsai, Chih-Ling 2010 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
20 R. Tibshirani 1996 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Chen, Scott Shaobing and Donoho, David L and Saund... 2001 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Fan, Jianqing and Li, Runze 2001 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Zou, Hui 2006 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Yuan, Ming and Lin, Yi 2006 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Meinshausen, Nicolai and Bu 2006 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Yuan, Ming and Lin, Yi 2007 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Friedman, Jerome and Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani... 2008 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Hansheng Wang and Guodong Li and Tsai, Chin Ling 2007 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Ni, Ai and Cai, Jianwen 2018 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Foygel, Rina and Drton, Mathias 2010 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Lee, Eun Ryung and Noh, Hohsuk and Park, Byeong U 2014 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Kim, Yongdai and Kwon, Sunghoon and Choi, Hosik 2012 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Raskutti, Garvesh and Wainwright, Martin J and Yu,... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Raskutti, Garvesh and Wainwright, Martin J and Yu,... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Negahban, Sahand and Wainwright, Martin J and othe... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.