Citation Analysis

Design-Based Multi-Way Clustering
Luther Yap
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01658

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,802

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Yap, Luther (self)	2023	5	4	6.0	0.179	0.843	60%
2	Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...	2023	4	2	5.0	0.143	0.811	100%
3	Davezies, Laurent and D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier and ...	2018	3	2	4.0	0.107	0.737	100%
4	Cameron, A Colin and Gelbach, Jonah B and Miller, ...	2011	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
5	Gruber, Jonathan and Madrian, Brigitte C	1995	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
6	Hersch, Joni	1998	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
7	Nunn, Nathan and Wantchekon, Leonard	2011	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
8	Liang, Kung-Yee and Zeger, Scott L	1986	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
9	Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
10	MacKinnon, James G and Nielsen, Morten \O	2021	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
11	Eicker, Friedhelm	1967	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
12	Huber, Peter J	1967	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
13	White, Halbert	1980	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
14			1	1	1.0	0.036	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.