Citation Analysis

The Robust F-Statistic as a Test for Weak Instruments
Frank Windmeijer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01637
86
Citation mentions
24
Cited references
10
Sections
7,170
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 James H. Stock and Motohiro Yogo 2005 5 4 9.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Isaiah Andrews and James H. Stock and Liyang Sun 2019 12 5 22.0 0.140 1.000 100%
3 Isaiah Andrews 2018 21 9 35.0 0.244 0.984 95%
4 Jos\'e 2013 19 8 30.0 0.221 0.982 95%
5 A. L. Nagar 1959 3 3 6.0 0.035 0.843 100%
6 Douglas Staiger and James H. Stock 1997 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
7 Carolin E. Pflueger and Su Wang 2015 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
8 StataCorp. 2023 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Daniel J. Lewis and Karel Mertens 2022 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 P. B. Patnaik 1949 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
11 Windmeijer, Frank (self) 2023 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
12 Melvin Stephens and Dou-Yan Yang 2014 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
13 Murice Bun and Monique de Haan 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Joshua D. Angrist 1991 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Angrist, Joshua David and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen 2009 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Paul A. Bekker and Jan Ploeg 2005 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Frank Windmeijer (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Christopher Skeels and Frank Windmeijer (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Kling, Jeffrey R 2006 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Frandsen, Brigham and Lefgren, Lars and Leslie, Em... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Megan T Stevenson 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Cristiopher F. Baum and Mark E. Schaffer and Steve... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Manuel Arellano and Stephen Bond 1991 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Thomas J. Rothenberg 1984 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.