Citation Analysis

Another Look at the Linear Probability Model and Nonlinear Index Models
Kaicheng Chen, Robert S. Martin, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15338

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,872

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Wooldridge, Jeffrey M (self)	2010	9	3	14.0	0.346	1.000	100%
2	Stoker, Thomas M	1986	4	3	7.0	0.154	0.928	100%
3	Horrace, William C. and Oaxaca, Ronald L.	2006	4	3	6.0	0.154	0.928	100%
4	Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jo	2009	2	2	3.0	0.077	0.644	100%
5	Newey, Whitney K. and McFadden, Daniel	1994	2	2	4.0	0.077	0.644	100%
6	Wooldridge, Jeffrey M (self)	2019	1	1	1.0	0.038	0.406	100%
7	van den Berg, Gerard J and Siflinger, Bettina M	2022	1	1	1.0	0.038	0.406	100%
8	Horowitz, Joel L and Savin, NE	2001	1	1	2.0	0.038	0.406	100%
9	Ruud, Paul A	1983	1	1	2.0	0.038	0.406	100%
10	Hunter, William C and Walker, Mary Beth	1996	1	1	2.0	0.038	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.