Citation Analysis

\bfseries \large\uppercaseDonut Regression Discontinuity Designs
Cladia Noack, Chistoph Rothe
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14464

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,479

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Armstrong, T. and M. Kolesar	2018	4	4	7.0	0.222	0.928	100%
2	Kolesár, M. and C. Rothe (self)	2018	3	3	5.0	0.167	0.843	100%
3	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2020	2	2	3.0	0.111	0.644	100%
4	Barreca, A. I., M. Guldi, J. M. Lindo, and G. R. W...	2011	2	1	2.0	0.111	0.511	100%
5	Hahn, J., P. Todd, and W. Van der Klaauw	2001	1	1	1.0	0.056	0.406	100%
6	Lee, D. S. and T. Lemieux	2010	1	1	1.0	0.056	0.406	100%
7	Almond, D., J. J. Doyle Jr, A. E. Kowalski, and H....	2010	1	1	1.0	0.056	0.406	100%
8	Fan, J. and I. Gijbels	1996	1	1	2.0	0.056	0.406	100%
9	Abadie, A. and G. W. Imbens	2006	1	1	2.0	0.056	0.406	100%
10	Abadie, A., G. W. Imbens, and F. Zheng	2014	1	1	2.0	0.056	0.406	100%
11	Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and R. Titiunik	2014	1	1	2.0	0.056	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.