← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2308.13564
Xiaohong Chen, Sokbae Lee, Yuan Liao, Myung Hwan Seo, Youngki Shin, Myunghyun Song
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13564
97
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
10
Sections
9,022
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Angrist, J. D. and A. B. Krueger 1991 8 3 15.0 0.082 1.000 100%
2 Angrist, J. D. and W. N. Evans 1998 6 3 11.0 0.062 1.000 100%
3 Lee, S., Y. Liao, M. H. Seo, and Y. Shin (self) 2022a 9 5 12.5 0.093 0.962 89%
4 Kiefer, N. M., T. J. Vogelsang, and H. Bunzel 2000 4 3 7.0 0.041 0.928 100%
5 Polyak, B. T. and A. B. Juditsky 1992 8 4 8.0 0.082 0.794 50%
6 Hansen, P 1982 3 2 3.0 0.031 0.644 67%
7 Robbins, H. and S. Monro 1951 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
8 Bottou, L., F. E. Curtis, and J. Nocedal 2018 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
9 Velasco, C. and P. M. Robinson 2001 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
10 Gupta, A. and M. H. Seo (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
11 Lee, S., Y. Liao, M. H. Seo, and Y. Shin (self) 2022b 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
12 Kuan, C.-M. and H. White 1994 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
13 Chen, X. and H. White (self) 2002 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
14 Agarwal, A., S. Negahban, and M. J. Wainwright 2010 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
15 Toulis, P. and E. M. Airoldi 2017 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
16 Liang, T. and W. J. Su 2019 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
17 Anastasiou, A., K. Balasubramanian, and M. A. Erdo... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
18 Fang, Y., J. Xu, and L. Yang 2018 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
19 Zhu, W., X. Chen, and W. B. Wu (self) 2023 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
20 Chen, X., Z. Lai, H. Li, and Y. Zhang (self) 2021 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
21 Li, X., J. Liang, X. Chang, and Z. Zhang 2022 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
22 Venkatraman, A., W. Sun, M. Hebert, J. Bagnell, an... 2016 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
23 Della Vecchia, R. and D. Basu 2023 2 1 2.0 0.021 0.511 100%
24 Benveniste, A., M. Metivier, and P. Priouret 2012 3 2 3.0 0.031 0.511 33%
25 White, H 1989 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Pastorello, S., V. Patilea, and E. Renault 2003 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Chen, X. and H. White (self) 1998 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Lee, Y., S. Lee, and J.-H. Won (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Mou, W., C. J. Li, M. J. Wainwright, P. L. Bartlet... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Chen, X., J. D. Lee, X. T. Tong, and Y. Zhang (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Chee, J., H. Kim, and P. Toulis 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Sun, Y., P. C. Phillips, and S. Jin 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Sun, Y 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Chen, X., Z. Liao, and Y. Sun (self) 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Lazarus, E., D. J. Lewis, J. H. Stock, and M. W. W... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Polyak, B. T 1990 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Ruppert, D 1988 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Robbins, H. and D. Siegmund 1971 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Hall, P. and C. C. Heyde 1980 3 1 1.5 0.031 0.126 0%
44 Zhu, Y. and J. Dong 2021 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.