Citation Analysis

Testing Partial Instrument Monotonicity
Hongyi Jiang, Zhenting Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08390
45
Citation mentions
11
Cited references
5
Sections
2,960
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kitagawa, Toru 2015 7 3 9.5 0.156 0.950 86%
2 Sun, Zhenting (self) 2023 11 4 16.0 0.244 0.935 82%
3 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander and Walt... 2021 14 3 19.5 0.311 0.923 79%
4 Thornton, Rebecca L 2008 6 3 5.0 0.133 0.693 33%
5 Huber, Martin and Mellace, Giovanni 2015 1 1 1.0 0.022 0.406 100%
6 Mourifie 2017 1 1 1.0 0.022 0.406 100%
7 Beare, Brendan K and Shi, Xiaoxia 2019 1 1 2.0 0.022 0.406 100%
8 Sun, Zhenting and Beare, Brendan K. (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.022 0.406 100%
9 Linton, Oliver and Song, Kyungchul and Whang, Yoon... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.022 0.406 100%
10 Sokbae Lee and Kyungchul Song and Yoon-Jae Whang 2013 1 1 2.0 0.022 0.406 100%
11 Giacomini, Raffaella and Politis, Dimitris N and W... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.022 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.