← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Solving the Forecast Combination Puzzle
David T. Frazier, Ryan Covey, Gael M. Martin, Donald Poskitt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05263
109
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
9
Sections
7,478
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Geweke, J. and Amisano, G 2011 7 5 10.0 0.064 1.000 100%
2 Smith, J. and Wallis, K. F 2009 22 9 35.0 0.202 0.969 91%
3 West, K. D 1996 4 4 8.0 0.037 0.928 100%
4 White, H 2000 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
5 Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E 2007 3 3 6.0 0.028 0.843 100%
6 Gneiting, T. and Ranjan, R 2013 3 2 5.0 0.028 0.737 100%
7 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W 2004 4 1 4.0 0.037 0.644 100%
8 Martin, G. M., Loaiza-Maya, R., Maneesoonthorn, W.... (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
9 Hansen, P. R 2005 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
10 Zischke, R., Martin, G. M., Frazier, D. T., and Po... (self) 2022 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Stone, M 1961 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
12 Bates, J. M. and Granger, C. W 1969 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
13 Timmermann, A 2006 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
14 Claeskens, G., Magnus, J. R., Vasnev, A. L., and W... 2016 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
15 Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., and Assimakopoulos,... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
16 Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., and Assimakopoulos,... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
17 Gneiting, T. and Ranjan, R 2011 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
18 Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D 1994 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
19 Clements, A. and Vasnev, A. L 2021 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
20 Aastveit, K. A., Mitchell, J., Ravazzolo, F., and ... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Hall, S. G. and Mitchell, J 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Opschoor, A., Van Dijk, D., and van der Wel, M 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Ranjan, R. and Gneiting, T 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Satopaa, V. A., Baron, J., Foster, D. P., Mellers,... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Baran, S. and Lerch, S 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Thorey, J., Chaussin, C., and Mallet, V 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Wang, L., Wang, Z., Qu, H., and Liu, S 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Taylor, J. W 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Elliott, G 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Chan, F. and Pauwels, L. L 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Graefe, A., Armstrong, J. S., Jones Jr, R. J., and... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Van Der Vaart, A 1998 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Fissler, T. and Ziegel, J. F 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Patton, A. J 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Pesaran, M. H. and Skouras, S 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Granger, C. W. and Machina, M. J 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Frazier, D. T. and Renault, E (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Clark, T. and McCracken, M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Okui, R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Corsi, F 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Corsi, F., Audrino, F., and Renò, R 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Andrews, D. W 1999 9 3 4.5 0.083 0.215 0%
43 Yuan, K.-H. and Jennrich, R. I 1998 3 1 1.5 0.028 0.126 0%
44 van der Vaart, A., van der Vaart, A. W., van der V... 1996 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
45 Johnson, S. G 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
46 Kraft, D 1988 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
47 Kraft, D 1994 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
48 Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Wright, M. H 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.