Citation Analysis

Causal Interpretation of Linear Social Interaction Models with Endogenous Networks
Tadao Hoshino
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04276
36
Citation mentions
28
Cited references
9
Sections
4,517
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 4 4 7.0 0.111 0.928 100%
2 4 2 5.0 0.111 0.811 100%
3 3 1 6.0 0.083 0.585 100%
4 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
5 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
6 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
7 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
8 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
9 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
10 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
11 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
12 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
13 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
14 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
15 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
16 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
17 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.028 0.406 100%
20 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
21 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
22 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
23 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
24 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
28 1 1 2.0 0.028 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.