Citation Analysis

\bf Inference for Low-rank Completion without Sample Splitting with Application to Treatment Effect Estimation
Jungjun Choi, Hyukjun Kwon, Yuan Liao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16370
65
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
14
Sections
7,369
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hansen, Christian and Lia... (self) 2021 5 5 7.5 0.077 1.000 100%
2 Chen, Yuxin and Fan, Jianqing and Ma, Cong and Yan... 2019 8 3 10.0 0.123 1.000 100%
3 Chen, Yuxin and Chi, Yuejie and Fan, Jianqing and ... 2020 4 3 5.5 0.062 0.928 100%
4 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hansen, Christian Bailey ... (self) 2019 4 4 5.5 0.062 0.928 100%
5 Xia, Dong and Yuan, Ming 2021 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
6 Xiong, R and Pelger, M 2020 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
7 Jin, Sainan and Miao, Ke and Su, Liangjun 2021 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
8 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 2015 2 2 4.0 0.031 0.644 100%
9 Cox, Gary W and McCubbins, Mathew D 1986 3 1 6.0 0.046 0.585 100%
10 Larcinese, Valentino and Rizzo, Leonzio and Testa,... 2006 3 1 6.0 0.046 0.585 100%
11 Athey, Susan and Bayati, Mohsen and Doudchenko, Ni... 2021 2 2 1.0 0.031 0.511 50%
12 Agarwal, Anish and Dahleh, Munther and Shah, Devav... 2021 2 1 1.0 0.031 0.511 100%
13 Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef 1995 2 1 4.0 0.031 0.511 100%
14 Cande 2009 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
15 Candes, Emmanuel J and Plan, Yaniv 2010 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 Koltchinskii, Vladimir and Lounici, Karim and Tsyb... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Negahban, Sahand and Wainwright, Martin J 2012 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Beck, Amir and Teboulle, Marc 2009 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Cai, Jian-Feng and Cande 2010 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Mazumder, Rahul and Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani,... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Ma, Shiqian and Goldfarb, Donald and Chen, Lifeng 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Parikh, Neal and Boyd, Stephen 2014 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Ma, Cong and Wang, Kaizheng and Chi, Yuejie and Ch... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Chen, Ji and Liu, Dekai and Li, Xiaodong 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Yan, Yuling and Chen, Yuxin and Fan, Jianqing 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Farias, Vivek and Li, Andrew and Peng, Tianyi 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Bai, Jushan and Ng, Serena 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Arkhangelsky, Dmitry and Athey, Susan and Hirshber... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Little, Roderick JA and Rubin, Donald B 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Schnabel, Tobias and Swaminathan, Adith and Singh,... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Ma, Wei and Chen, George H 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Jankova, Jana and Van De Geer, Sara 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Anderson, Gary M and Tollison, Robert D 1991 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 McCarty, Nolan M 2000 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Berry, Christopher R and Burden, Barry C and Howel... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Bai, Jushan 2003 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.