← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Functional Differencing in Networks
Stéphane Bonhomme, Kevin Dano
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11484
104
Citation mentions
51
Cited references
12
Sections
6,285
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Graham, Bryan S 2017 9 6 16.0 0.087 1.000 100%
2 Lentz, Rasmus and Piyapromdee, Suphanit and Robin,... 2022 5 3 9.0 0.048 1.000 100%
3 Dobronyi, Christopher and Gu, Jiaying and Kim, Kyo... 2021 5 4 8.0 0.048 1.000 100%
4 Abowd, John M and Kramarz, Francis and Margolis, D... 1999 8 6 13.0 0.077 0.957 88%
5 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2012 7 5 11.0 0.067 0.950 86%
6 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2019 4 3 7.0 0.038 0.928 100%
7 Andrews, Martyn J and Gill, Leonard and Schank, Th... 2008 4 4 7.0 0.038 0.928 100%
8 Kline, Patrick and Saggio, Raffaele and S\o 2020 3 3 5.0 0.029 0.843 100%
9 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2023 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
10 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2013 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
11 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Rasch, Georg 1960 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Andersen, Erling Bernhard 1970 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Arellano, Manuel and Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2012 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Honore 2020 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Dano, Kevin (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Dhaene, Geert and Weidner, Martin 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
18 Davezies, Laurent and D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier and ... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
19 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Carro, Jesu 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
20 Pakel, Cavit and Weidner, Martin 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
21 Shimer, Robert and Smith, Lones 2000 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Postel--Vinay, Fabien and Robin, Jean--Marc 2002 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Hahn, Jinyong and Newey, Whitney 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Dhaene, Geert and Jochmans, Koen 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Ferna 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Hughes, David William 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Graham, Bryan S 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Woodcock, Simon D 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Honore 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Becker, Gary S 1973 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Ahmadpoor, Mohammad and Jones, Benjamin F 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Bickel, Peter J and Chen, Aiyou 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 De Paula, A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Gualdani, Cristina 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Sheng, Shuyang 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Arellano, Manuel and Bond, Stephen 1991 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Kuersteiner, Guido M and Prucha, Ingmar R 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Bonhomme, Ste (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Carrasco, Marine and Florens, Jean-Pierre and Rena... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Engl, Heinz Werner and Hanke, Martin and Neubauer,... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Card, David and Heining, Jo 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Song, Jae and Price, David J and Guvenen, Fatih an... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Chamberlain, Gary 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Abowd, John M and Creecy, Robert H and Kramarz, Fr... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Lachowska, Marta and Mas, Alexandre and Saggio, Ra... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Benson, Alan and Li, Danielle and Shue, Kelly 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Gu 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Margolis, David N 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Davezies, Laurent and D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier and ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Charbonneau, Karyne B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.