← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbf Claim Reserving via Inverse Probability Weighting: \\ A Micro-Level Chain-Ladder Method
Sebastian Calcetero-Vanegas, Andrei L. Badescu, X. Sheldon Lin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10808
109
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
11
Sections
18,536
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Mart\'\inez-Miranda, M. D., Nielsen, J. P., and Ve... 2012 5 4 8.0 0.046 1.000 100%
2 Thompson, S. K 2012 7 3 14.0 0.064 1.000 100%
3 Engler, N. and Lindskog, F 2024 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
4 Arnab, R 2017 3 2 6.0 0.028 0.737 100%
5 Fung, T. C., Badescu, A. L., and Lin, X. S (self) 2022 3 2 6.0 0.028 0.737 100%
6 Mack, T 1999 3 2 5.0 0.028 0.737 100%
7 Bender, A., Groll, A., and Scheipl, F 2018 3 3 4.5 0.028 0.737 67%
8 Wuthrich, M. V. and Merz, M 2008 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
9 England, P. and Verrall, R 2002 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
10 Taylor, G. and McGuire, G 2016 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Pittarello, G., Hiabu, M., and Villegas, A. M 2023 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Antonio, K. and Plat, R 2014 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Asmussen, S. and Steffensen, M 2020 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Sarndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J 2003 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., and Ridder, G 2003 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Hiabu, M., Mammen, E., Mart\'\inez-Miranda, M. D.,... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Ma, X. and Wang, J 2020 4 1 8.0 0.037 0.644 100%
18 Hiabu, M 2017 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 London, D 1997 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Andersen, P. K., Ørnulf Borgan, Hjort, N. L., Arja... 1985 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Klein, J. P. and Moeschberger, M. L 2003 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Ruschendorf, L 2009 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
23 Mack, T 1994 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
24 Francis, L 2016 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
25 Berger, Y. G 1998 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
26 Chen, Q., Elliott, M. R., Haziza, D., Yang, Y., Gh... 2017 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
27 Verrall, R., Nielsen, J., and Jessen, A 2010 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
28 George, B., Seals, S., and Aban, I 2014 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
29 Sonabend, R., Kiraly, F. J., Bender, A., Bischl, B... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
30 Cook, R. J., Lawless, J. F., et al 2007 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.511 50%
31 Schmidt, K 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Taha, A., Cosgrave, B., Rashwan, W., and McKeever,... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Quarg, G. and Mack, T 2004 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Wuthrich, M. V 2018b 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Crevecoeur, J., Robben, J., and Antonio, K 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Boumezoued, A. and Devineau, L 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Taylor, G., McGuire, G., and Sullivan, J 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Wuthrich, M. V 2018a 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Fung, T. C., Badescu, A. L., and Lin, X. S (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Yao, L., Chu, Z., Li, S., Li, Y., Gao, J., and Zha... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Salditt, M. and Nestler, S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Kim, J. K. and Shao, J 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Fattorini, L 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Chauvet, G. and Vallée, A.-A 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Tan, Z 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Fattorini, L 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Hulliger, B 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Wang, X., van Eeden, C., and Zidek, J. V 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Wahl, F., Lindholm, M., and Verrall, R 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Mart\'\inez-Miranda, M. D., Nielsen, J. P., Sperli... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Bischofberger, S. M., Hiabu, M., and Isakson, A 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Hiabu, M., Hofman, E., and Pittarello, G 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Verrall, R. J. and Wuthrich, M. V 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Tseung, S. C., Badescu, A. L., Fung, T. C., and Li... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Wiegrebe, S., Kopper, P., Sonabend, R., Bischl, B.... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Verbelen, R., Gong, L., Antonio, K., Badescu, A., ... (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Vakulenko-Lagun, B., Mandel, M., and Betensky, R. ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Andersen, P. K. and Ravn, H 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.