Citation Analysis

\textbfDecentralized Decision-Making in Retail Chains:\\Evidence from Inventory Management
Victor Aguirregabiria, Francis Guiton
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05562
102
Citation mentions
39
Cited references
8
Sections
5,180
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 V Aguirregabiria and D Ershov and J Suzuki (self) 2016 6 3 12.0 0.059 1.000 100%
2 V Aguirregabiria and P Mira (self) 2002 6 2 12.0 0.059 0.874 100%
3 S DellaVigna and M. Gentzkow 2019 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
4 A Horta\cc 2021 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
5 J Eberly 1994 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
6 O Attanasio 2000 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
7 J Adda and R Cooper 2000 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
8 Liquor Control Board of Ontario 2016 4 2 8.0 0.039 0.811 100%
9 V Aguirregabiria (self) 1999 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
10 R Bray and Y Yao and Y Duan and J Huo 2019 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
11 G Hadley and T Whitin 1963 4 2 5.0 0.039 0.644 50%
12 A Blinder 1981 4 2 5.0 0.039 0.644 50%
13 P Aghion and N Bloom and B Lucking and R Sadun and... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
14 G Hall and J Rust 2000 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
15 O Kryvtsov and V Midrigan 2013 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
16 A Goldfarb and M. Xiao 2011 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
17 V Aguirregabiria and A Magesan (self) 2020 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
18 Huang, Yufeng and Ellickson, Paul B and Lovett, Mi... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
19 S Ellison and C Snyder and H. Zhang 2018 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
20 A Horta\cc 2008 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
21 U Doraszelski and G Lewis and A Pakes 2018 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
22 A Horta\cc 2019 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
23 Liquor Control Board of Ontario 2012 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
24 Liquor Control Board of Ontario 2013 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
25 JK Arrow and T Harris and J. Marschak 1951 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
26 H Scarf 1959 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
27 E Denardo 1981 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
28 G Hitsch and A Horta\cc 2021 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
29 S Cho and J Rust 2010 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
30 E Miravete and K Seim and J Thurk 2020 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
31 G Bertola and L Guiso and L Pistaferri 2005 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
32 Eric Anderson and Gavan Fitzsimons and Duncan Sime... 2006 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
33 J Rust 1987 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
34 M Puterman 2014 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
35 C Cimini and A Lagorio and F Pirola and R Pinto 2019 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
36 Inderst, Roman and Mu 2007 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
37 J Rust 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 D Arthur and S Vassilvitskii 2007 2 1 1.0 0.020 0.110 0%
39 Gu, Jiaying and Koenker, Roger 2017 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.