Citation Analysis

A maximal inequality for local empirical processes under weak dependence
Luis Alvarez, Cristine Pinto
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01328

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

2,741

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Uwe Einmahl and David M. Mason	2005	5	4	8.0	0.227	0.928	80%
2	Aad W. van der Vaart and Jon A. Wellner	1996	3	3	3.5	0.136	0.737	67%
3	Emmanuel Rio	2017	5	2	7.0	0.227	0.737	60%
4	Florence Merlev\`e	2009	3	2	4.5	0.136	0.644	67%
5	Juan Carlos Escanciano	2020	2	1	2.0	0.091	0.511	100%
6	Matias D. Cattaneo and Ricardo P. Masini and Willi...	2022	2	1	4.0	0.091	0.511	100%
7	Belloni, A. and Chernozhukov, V. and Fernández-Val...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.045	0.406	100%
8	Florence Merlev\`e	2010	1	1	2.0	0.045	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.