← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfDoubly Robust Estimation of Direct and Indirect Quantile Treatment Effects with Machine Learning
Yu-Chin Hsu, Martin Huber, Yu-Min Yen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01049
101
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
8
Sections
10,631
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Farbmacher, H., M. Huber, L. Laff\'ers, H. Langen,... (self) 2022 7 5 11.5 0.069 0.950 86%
2 Zhou, X. 2022 5 2 9.0 0.050 0.874 100%
3 Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J. and I. Shpitser 2012 4 2 6.0 0.040 0.811 100%
4 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern\'andez-Val, and B. Melly 2013 4 2 8.0 0.040 0.811 100%
5 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 9 7 9.5 0.089 0.763 44%
6 Imai, K., L. Keele, and T. Yamamoto 2010 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
7 Vaart, A. W. v. d. 1998 3 3 3.0 0.030 0.585 33%
8 Bind, M.-A. C., T. J. VanderWeele, J. D. Schwartz,... 2017 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
9 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, I. Fernandez-Val, an... 2017 30 9 18.5 0.297 0.464 10%
10 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1959 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
11 Pearl, J. 2000 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
12 Neyman, J. 1923 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
13 Rubin, D. B. 1974 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
14 Robins, J. M. and S. Greenland 1992 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
15 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2001 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
16 Hsu, Y.-C., M. Huber, and T.-C. Lai (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
17 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
18 Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Firpo, S. 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Donald, S. G. and Y.-C. Hsu (self) 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Ai, C., O. Linton, and Z. Zhang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Hsu, Y.-C., T.-C. Lai, and R. P. Lieli (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Huber, M., M. Schelker, and A. Strittmatter (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Athey, S. and G. Imbens 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Cox, D. 1958 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Rubin, D. 1980 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Robins, J. M., A. Rotnitzky, and L. P. Zhao 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Hahn, J. 1998 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern\'andez-Val, and A. Galic... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Foresi, S. and F. Peracchi 1995 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Schochet, P., J. Burghardt, and S. Glazerman 2001 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Schochet, P., J. Burghardt, and S. McConnell 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Flores, C. A., A. Flores-Lagunes, A. Gonzales, and... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Bodory, H., M. Huber, and L. Laffers (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Flores, C. A. and A. Flores-Lagunes 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Huber, M. (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Fr\"olich, M. and M. Huber (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Bodory, H. and M. Huber (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Hines, O., O. Dukes, K. Diaz-Ordaz, and S. Vanstee... 2022 2 1 1.0 0.020 0.110 0%
41 Fisher, A. and E. H. Kennedy 2019 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
42 Levy, J. 2019 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
43 Ichimura, H. and W. K. Newey 2022 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.