← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Quantifying Distributional Model Risk in Marginal Problems via Optimal Transport
Yanqin Fan, Hyeonseok Park, Gaoqian Xu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00779
174
Citation mentions
60
Cited references
12
Sections
10,357
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Blanchet, Murthy 2019 8 3 12.0 0.046 1.000 100%
2 Rüschendorf 1991 8 5 14.0 0.046 1.000 100%
3 Embrechts, Puccetti 2010 6 5 10.0 0.034 1.000 100%
4 Fan, Guerre, Zhu (self) 2017 5 4 8.0 0.029 1.000 100%
5 Awasthi, Jung, Morgenstern 2022 6 3 10.0 0.034 1.000 100%
6 Adjaho, Christensen 2023 13 4 20.0 0.075 0.946 85%
7 Villani 2021 5 4 6.5 0.029 0.928 80%
8 Fan, Wu (self) 2009 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
9 Zhang, Yang, Gao 2022 14 7 20.5 0.080 0.923 79%
10 Villani 2009 7 6 9.0 0.040 0.894 71%
11 Yue, Kuhn, Wiesemann 2022 8 4 9.5 0.046 0.855 62%
12 Kellerer 1984 10 6 12.0 0.057 0.843 60%
13 Rachev, Rüschendorf 1998 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
14 Fan, Park (self) 2010 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
15 Fan, Park (self) 2012 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
16 Ridder, Moffitt 2007 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
17 Firpo, Ridder 2019 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
18 Vorob'ev 1962 3 3 3.5 0.017 0.737 67%
19 Kellerer 1964 5 3 4.5 0.029 0.737 40%
20 Shortt 1983 5 3 4.5 0.029 0.737 40%
21 Gao, Kleywegt 2022 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
22 Doan, Li, Natarajan 2015 2 2 4.0 0.011 0.644 100%
23 Kido 2022 4 1 8.0 0.023 0.644 100%
24 Embrechts, Puccetti, Rüschendorf 2013 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
25 Peyré, Cuturi 2018 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
26 Bertsekas, Shreve 1978 3 2 3.0 0.017 0.511 33%
27 Makarov 1982 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
28 Fan (self) 1953 3 2 3.0 0.017 0.511 33%
29 Kuhn, Esfahani, Nguyen, Shafieezadeh-Abadeh 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Blanchet, Murthy, Nguyen 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Kallus, Mao, Zhou 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Graham, Xavier\bibnamedelima Pinto, Egel 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Chen, Hong, Tarozzi 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Kitagawa, Tetenov 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Eckstein, Kupper, Pohl 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Sinha, Namkoong, Volpi, Duchi 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Rüschendorf 1982 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Frank, Nelsen, Schweizer 1987 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Embrechts, Höing, Juri 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Embrechts, Höing, Puccetti 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Fan, Park (self) 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Chen, Du, Tang, Jin, Yen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Pass 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Pass 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Pass 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Lindheim 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Nenna, Pass 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Mehta, Kline, Lokhande, Fung, Singh 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Mo, Qi, Liu 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Zhao, Zeng, Tangen, Leblanc 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Puccetti, Rüschendorf 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Ghossoub, Hall, Saunders 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Ennaji, Mérigot, Nenna, Pass 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Beiglböck, Schachermayer 2011 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
55 Aliprantis, Border 2006 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
56 Van Der\bibnamedelima Vaart, Wellner 1996 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
57 Fan, Henry (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
58 Joe 1997 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
59 Dudley 2014 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
60 Santambrogio 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.