Citation Analysis

Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects%
Tetsuya Kaji, Jianfei Cao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15048
63
Citation mentions
32
Cited references
8
Sections
7,142
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bitler, Gelbach and Hoynes 2006 11 4 20.0 0.175 1.000 100%
2 Tarozzi, Desai and Johnson 2015 6 3 11.0 0.095 1.000 100%
3 Heckman, Smith and Clements 1997 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
4 Chernozhukov, Lee and Rosen 2013 3 2 6.0 0.048 0.737 100%
5 Fan and Park 2010 3 2 2.5 0.048 0.644 67%
6 Athey and Imbens 2006 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
7 Imbens and Manski 2004 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Abadie, Chingos and West 2018 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
9 Tetenov 2012 2 1 2.0 0.032 0.511 100%
10 Abadie, Angrist and Imbens 2002 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
11 Ji, Lei and Spector 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 Horowitz and Manski 2000 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 Lee 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 DellaVigna and Kaplan 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Jun and Lee 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Abadie 2002 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val and Galichon 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Frolich and Melly 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Powell 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Gunsilius 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Firpo 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Frandsen, Frolich and Melly 2012 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Chernozhukov and Hansen 2006 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Stoye 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Bordley 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Nicholson and Hellman 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Makarov 1981 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Tarozzi, Desai and Johnson 2015 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Kitagawa and Tetenov 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Bitler, Gelbach and Hoynes 2006 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Beiglbock, Goldstern, Maresch and Schachermayer 2009 5 1 2.5 0.079 0.149 0%
32 Rachev and Ruschendorf 1998 2 1 1.0 0.032 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.