← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Identifying Socially Disruptive Policies
Eric Auerbach, Yong Cai
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15000
136
Citation mentions
62
Cited references
12
Sections
10,026
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Banerjee, Breza, Chandrasekhar, Duflo, Jackson and... 2021 19 8 33.0 0.140 0.982 95%
2 Cela 2013 3 3 5.0 0.022 0.843 100%
3 Finke, Burkard and Rendl 1987 5 4 7.0 0.037 0.843 60%
4 Whitt 1976 6 5 6.5 0.044 0.794 50%
5 Molinari 2020 3 3 3.5 0.022 0.737 67%
6 Graham 2020 23 8 20.0 0.169 0.673 30%
7 Lovasz 2012 7 5 5.5 0.051 0.659 29%
8 Jackson 2021 2 2 2.0 0.015 0.644 100%
9 Hoeffding 1940 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
10 Frechet 1951 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
11 Heckman, Smith and Clements 1997 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
12 Chatterjee 2015 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
13 Carrell, Sacerdote and West 2013 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
14 Serfling 2009 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.511 50%
15 Fafchamps and Gubert 2007 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.511 50%
16 Menzel 2017 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.511 50%
17 Leung 2015 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
18 Barnhardt, Field and Pande 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
19 Feigenberg, Field and Pande 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
20 Graham, Imbens and Ridder 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
21 Cai, De Janvry and Sadoulet (self) 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
22 Bajari, Burdick, Imbens, Masoero, McQueen, Richard... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 Comola and Prina 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Comola and Prina 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 He\ss, Jaimovich and Schundeln 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Johari, Li, Liskovich and Weintraub 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 de Paula 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Bramoulle, Djebbari and Fortin 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Chandrasekhar and Lewis 2011 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Thirkettle 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Makarov 1982 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Doksum 1974 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Lehmann 1975 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Manski 1997 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Manski 2003 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Bitler, Gelbach and Hoynes 2006 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Firpo 2007 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Fan and Park 2010 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Tamer 2010 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Abadie and Cattaneo 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Masten and Poirier 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Masten and Poirier 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Firpo and Ridder 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Frandsen and Lefgren 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Manski 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Bickel and Chen 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Zeleneev 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Auerbach (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Ridder and Sheng 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Menzel 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Olhede and Wolfe 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Zhang, Levina and Zhu 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Birman and Solomjak 2012 3 2 1.5 0.022 0.159 0%
55 Hardy, Littlewood and Polya 1952 3 1 1.5 0.022 0.126 0%
56 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.110 0%
57 Dudley 2002 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
58 Birkhoff 1946 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
59 Hoffman and Wielandt 1953 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
60 Hoeffding 1948 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
61 Imbens and Manski 2004 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
62 Stoye 2009 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.