← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace*-1in
Kirill S. Evdokimov, Andrei Zeleneev
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14311
65
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
14
Sections
13,976
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Susanne M. Schennach 2007 4 3 6.0 0.062 0.928 100%
2 Evdokimov, Kirill S and Zeleneev, Andrei (self) 2022 3 3 5.0 0.046 0.843 100%
3 Chesher, Andrew and Schluter, Christian 2002 2 2 3.0 0.031 0.644 100%
4 Jerry A. Hausman and Hidehiko Ichimura and Whitney... 1991 3 1 3.0 0.046 0.585 100%
5 Whitney K. Newey 2001 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
6 Tong Li 2002 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
7 Susanne M. Schennach 2004 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
8 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne M. 2008 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
9 Yasuo Amemiya 1985 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
10 Whitney K. Newey and Daniel McFadden 1994 2 1 4.0 0.031 0.511 100%
11 Koppelman, Frank S and Wen, Chieh-Hua 2000 2 1 4.0 0.031 0.511 100%
12 J. A. Hausman and W. K. Newey and J. L. Powell 1995 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
13 Xiaohong Chen and Han Hong and Elie Tamer 2005 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
14 Susanne M. Schennach 2014 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
15 Daniel Wilhelm 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 John Bound and Alan B. Krueger 1991 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Bound, John and Brown, Charles and Duncan, Greg J.... 1994 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Pischke, Jörn-Steffen 1995 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Orley Ashenfelter and Alan Krueger 1994 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Douglas Staiger and James H. Stock 1997 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Raymond J. Carroll and Xiaohong Chen and Yingyao H... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Xiaohong Chen and Han Hong and Denis Nekipelov 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Susanne M. Schennach 2016 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Susanne M. Schennach 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Kirk M. Wolter and Wayne A. Fuller 1982 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Joseph B. Kadane 1971 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Andrew Chesher 1991 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Chesher, Andrew and Dumangane, Montezuma and Smith... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Erich Battistin and Andrew Chesher 2014 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Andrew Chesher 2017 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Han Hong and Elie Tamer 2003 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
32 John Bound and Charles Brown and Nancy Mathiowetz 2001 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Liqun Wang and Cheng Hsiao 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Jinyong Hahn and Jerry Hausman and Jeonghwan Kim 2021 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Yasuo Amemiya 1990 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Reiers\o 1950 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Arthur Lewbel 1997 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Timothy Erickson and Toni M. Whited 2002 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
39 S. M. Schennach and Yingyao Hu 2013 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
40 Dan Ben-Moshe and Xavier D'Haultfoe 2017 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
41 Tong Li and Quang Vuong 1998 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 Kitamura, Yuichi and Otsu, Taisuke and Evdokimov, ... (self) 2013 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 Isaiah Andrews and Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. S... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
44 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesa 2021 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
45 Bonhomme, Ste 2022 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
46 Evdokimov, Kirill S and Zeleneev, Andrei (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
47 Evdokimov, Kirill S and Zeleneev, Andrei (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
48 McFadden, Daniel 1974 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
49 Wen, Chieh-Hua and Koppelman, Frank S 2001 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
50 Hansen, Bruce E 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.