← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf\sc Statistical tests for replacing human decision makers with algorithms
Kai Feng, Han Hong, Ke Tang, Jingyuan Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11689
177
Citation mentions
109
Cited references
11
Sections
27,814
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Currie,Janet and MacLeod, WB 2017 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
2 Chan, David C and Gentzkow, Matthew and Yu, Chuan 2022 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
3 Esteva, Andre and Kuprel, Brett and Novoa, Roberto... 2017 6 1 6.0 0.034 0.693 100%
4 Kermany, Daniel S and Goldbaum, Michael and Cai, W... 2018 6 1 6.0 0.034 0.693 100%
5 Liang, Huiying and Tsui, Brian Y. and Ni, Hao and ... 2019 5 1 5.0 0.028 0.693 100%
6 Fuster, Andreas and Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Ra... 2022 4 1 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
7 Berk, Richard 2017 4 1 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
8 Kleinberg, Jon and Lakkaraju, Himabindu and Leskov... 2018 4 1 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Peng, Sui and Liu, Yihao and Lv, Weiming and Liu, ... (self) 2021 4 1 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 Han, Seung Seog and Park, Ilwoo and Chang, Sung Eu... 2020 4 1 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
11 Bansal, Gagan and Wu, Tongshuang and Zhou, Joyce a... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
12 Feng, Kai and Hong, Han (self) 2024 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
13 Berg, Tobias and Burg, Valentin and Gombovi\'c 2020 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
14 Sadhwani, Apaar and Giesecke, Kay and Sirignano, J... 2021 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
15 Rajpurkar, Pranav and Hannun, Awni Y and Haghpanah... 2017 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
16 Ardila, Diego and Kiraly, Atilla P and Bharadwaj, ... 2019 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
17 Tian, Fei and Liu, Dong and Wei, Na and Fu, Qianqi... (self) 2024 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
18 Long, Erping and Lin, Haotian and Liu, Zhenzhen an... (self) 2017 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
19 De Fauw, Jeffrey and Ledsam, Joseph R and Romera-P... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
20 Hannun, Awni Y and Rajpurkar, Pranav and Haghpanah... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
21 Daneshjou, Roxana and Vodrahalli, Kailas and Novoa... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
22 Ashar, Yoni K and Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R and Dim... 2017 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
23 Yoon, Jeewoo and Kang, Chaewon and Kim, Seungbae a... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
24 McKinney, Scott Mayer and Sieniek, Marcin and Godb... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
25 Uhm, Kwang-Hyun and Jung, Seung-Won and Choi, Moon... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
26 Dwyer, Dominic B and Falkai, Peter and Koutsouleri... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
27 Fuster, Andreas and Plosser, Matthew and Schnabl, ... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
28 Vallee, Boris and Zeng, Yao 2019 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
29 Zeng, Jiaming and Ustun, Berk and Rudin, Cynthia 2017 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
30 Wang, Jingyuan and Gallo, Edoardo and Zhang, Wei a... (self) 2023 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
31 Mullainathan, Sendhil and Obermeyer, Ziad 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
32 O'neil, Cathy 2017 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
33 Eubanks, Virginia 2018 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
34 Berk, Richard and Heidari, Hoda and Jabbari, Shahi... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
35 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey 2018 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
36 Frandsen, Brigham and Lefgren, Lars and Leslie, Em... 2023 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
37 Kahneman, Daniel and Klein, Gary 2009 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
38 Feng, Kai and Hong, Han and Tang, Ke and Wang, Jin... (self) 2022 2 2 2.5 0.011 0.511 50%
39 Kim, Jae-Young 2002 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
40 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hong, Han (self) 2003 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
41 Gulshan, Varun and Peng, Lily and Coram, Marc and ... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Castro, Victor M and Dligach, Dmitriy and Finan, S... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Mullainathan, Sendhil and Spiess, Jann 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Ozturk, Tulin and Talo, Muhammed and Yildirim, Eyl... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Koutsouleris, Nikolaos and Meisenzahl, Eva M and B... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Erickson, Bradley J and Korfiatis, Panagiotis and ... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Johnson, Kipp W and Torres Soto, Jessica and Glick... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Chan, Stephanie and Reddy, Vidhatha and Myers, Bri... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Huang, Shih-Cheng and Pareek, Anuj and Seyyedi, Sa... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Swanson, Kyle and Wu, Eric and Zhang, Angela and A... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Fekadu, Rufael and Getachew, Anteneh and Tadele, Y... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Chalfin, Aaron and Danieli, Oren and Hillis, Andre... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Sajjadiani, Sima and Sojourner, Aaron J and Kammey... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Studdert, David M and Mello, Michelle M and Sage, ... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Johnson, Erin M and Rehavi, M Marit 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Lopez, Carolina and Sautmann, Anja and Schaner, Si... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Brennan, Meghan and Puri, Sahil and Ozrazgat-Basla... (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Yang, Jiehua and Xie, Mingfei and Hu, Canpei and A... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Jin, Weina and Fatehi, Mostafa and Guo, Ru and Ham... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Yu, Feiyang and Moehring, Alex and Banerjee, Oishi... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Wang, Ziyi and Wei, Lijia and Xue, Lian (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Kawaguchi, Kohei 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Rohan Alur and Loren Laine and Darrick K. Li and M... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Donahue, Kate and Chouldechova, Alexandra and Kent... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Rambachan, Ashesh and Kleinberg, Jon and Ludwig, J... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Adepoju, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade and Albersen, Bregje... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Guo, Jonathan and Li, Bin 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Trivedi, Anusua and Mukherjee, Sumit and Tse, Edmu... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Mondal, Himel and Mondal, Shaikat and Singla, Raje... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Bulathwela, Sahan and Pe 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Tang, Huan (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Le, Hong Hanh and Viviani, Jean-Laurent 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Arnold, David and Dobbie, Will and Yang, Crystal S 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Arnold, David and Dobbie, Will and Hull, Peter 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Chouldechova, Alexandra 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Starr, Sonja B 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 Kay, Matthew and Matuszek, Cynthia and Munson, Sea... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Bolukbasi, Tolga and Chang, Kai-Wei and Zou, James... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 Zhao, Jieyu and Wang, Tianlu and Yatskar, Mark and... (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 Baker, Ryan S and Hawn, Aaron 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
83 Hutchinson, Ben and Mitchell, Margaret 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
84 Kizilcec, Rene 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
85 Ali, Md Mamun and Paul, Bikash Kumar and Ahmed, Ka... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
86 Kshirsagar, Abhijit V and Bang, Heejung and Bombac... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
87 Li, Rui 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
88 Maroco, Joao and Silva, Dina and Rodrigues, Ana an... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
89 Kwekha-Rashid, Ameer Sardar and Abduljabbar, Heamn... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
90 Alimadadi, Ahmad and Aryal, Sachin and Manandhar, ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
91 Uddin, Shahadat and Khan, Arif and Hossain, Md Ekr... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
92 Yarkoni, Tal and Westfall, Jacob 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
93 Mariani, Marcello M and Perez-Vega, Rodrigo and Wi... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
94 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
95 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
96 Manski, Charles F 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
97 Vytlacil, Edward 2002 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
98 De Chaisemartin, Clement 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
99 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W 1995 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
100 Kotz, Samuel and Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy and J... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
101 Elliott, Graham and Lieli, Robert P 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
102 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie and Tang, Ke and Wang, Ji... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
103 Feng, Kai and Hong, Han and Tang, Ke and Wang, Jin... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
104 Andrews, Donald WK and Shi, Xiaoxia 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
105 Fang, Zheng and Santos, Andres 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
106 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
107 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
108 Breiman, Leo 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
109 Baeza-Yates, Ricardo and Ribeiro-Neto, Berthier an... 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.