Citation Analysis

Formal Covariate Benchmarking to Bound Omitted Variable Bias
Deepankar Basu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10562
82
Citation mentions
21
Cited references
9
Sections
10,220
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cinelli, C. and Hazlett, C 2020 40 21 63.0 0.488 1.000 100%
2 Oster, E 2019 7 3 11.0 0.085 1.000 100%
3 Greene, W. H 2012 6 3 12.0 0.073 1.000 100%
4 VanderWeele, T. J. and Ding, P 2017 4 1 4.0 0.049 0.644 100%
5 Krauth, B 2016 4 1 4.0 0.049 0.644 100%
6 Kruskal, W. and Majors, R 1989 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
7 Rao, C. R., Toutenburg, H., Shalabh, and Heumann, ... 2008 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Ding, P. and VanderWeele, T. J 2016 3 1 3.0 0.037 0.585 100%
9 De Luca, G., Magnus, J. R., and Peracchi, F 2019 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
10 Card, D 2001 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
11 Angrist, J. D. and Lavy, V 1999 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
12 De Luca, G., Magnus, J. R., and Peracchi, F 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Basu, D (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. C., Lilie... 1959 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B 1983 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Rosenbaum, P. R 2002 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Imbens, G. W 2003 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Imai, K., Keele, L., and Yamamoto, T 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Frank, K. A 2000 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Yule, G. U 1911 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Yule, G. U. and Kendall, M. G 1948 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.