Citation Analysis

Marijuana on Main Streets? The Story Continues in Colombia\\ An Endogenous Three-part Model
A. Ramirez-Hassan, C. Gomez, S. Velasquez, K. Tangarife
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10031
90
Citation mentions
65
Cited references
9
Sections
14,477
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Jacobi, Liana and Sovinsky, Michelle 2016 8 5 12.0 0.089 1.000 100%
2 Denise Kandel 1975 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
3 Denise B Kandel and Kazuo Yamaguchi and Kevin Chen 1992 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
4 Lloyd, Charlie 2013 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
5 D.S. Rubin-Kahana and J.-F. Crépault and J. Mathes... 2022 4 1 4.0 0.044 0.644 100%
6 Adam J. Davis and Karl R. Geisler and Mark W. Nich... 2016 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
7 Shaun Riley and Nicole Vellios and Corné van Walbe... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
8 Renu Sukharomana and Chia Lin Chang 2017 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Craig A. Gallet 2014 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 3 1 3.0 0.033 0.585 100%
11 UNODC 2022 2 1 2.0 0.022 0.511 100%
12 Van Ours, Jan C 2006 2 1 2.0 0.022 0.511 100%
13 Heidelberger, Philip and Welch, Peter D 1983 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
14 John Geweke 1992 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 UNODC 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Nkansah-Amankra, Stephen and Minelli, Mark 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Norstro 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 MacCoun, Robert and Reuter, Peter and Schelling, T... 1996 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Wen, Hefei and Hockenberry, Jason and Cummings, Ja... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Ja 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Pudney, Stephen 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Donohue III, John J and Ewing, Benjamin and Pelopq... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Christopher Mace and Elena Patel and Nathan Seeger... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Ian Irvine and Miles Light 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Michael R Caputo and Brian J Ostrom 1994 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Miron, Jeffrey A 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Becker, Gary S and Murphy, Kevin M and Grossman, M... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 ElSohly, Mahmoud A and Mehmedic, Zlatko and Foster... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 L.V. Moran and E.S. Tsang and D. Ongur and J. Hsu ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 J. Mennis and T.P. McKeon and G.J. Stahler 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 J.R. Kilmer and I.C. Rhew and K. Guttmannova and C... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 A.K. Barker and M.A. Moreno 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 M. Rotermann 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 H. Laqueur and A. Rivera-Aguirre and A. Shev and A... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Jeffrey DeSimone 1998 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 D. Hammond and E. Wadsworth and J.L. Reid and R. B... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 K. Guttmannova and C.B. Fleming and I.C. Rhew and ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 J.H. Kim and A.H. Weinberger and J. Zhu and J. Bar... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 A.H. Weinberger and K. Wyka and R.D. Goodwin 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Beau Kilmer and Susan S Everingham and Jonathan P ... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Michael Grossman 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Charles T Nisbet and Firouz Vakil 1972 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Van Ours, Jan C and Williams, Jenny 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 M. A. Tanner and W. H. Wong 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 P. Rossi and G. Allenby and R. McCulloch 2005 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Chib, Siddhartha and Greenberg, Edward and Jeliazk... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Li, Phillip 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Greenberg, Edward 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Raftery, Adrian E and Lewis, Steven and others 1992 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 McManus, Douglas A 1992 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Munkin, Murat K and Trivedi, Pravin K 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Ram\'\i 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Belle 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Barahona, Nano and Otero, Cristo 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 C.J. Berg and Z. Duan and Y. Wang and J.F. Thrashe... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Cannoy, Ciara N and Bauer, Samantha J and Prakash,... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 S.C. Kaai and G. Sansone and G. Meng and J.R. Ong'... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 T. Nguyen and G. Shah and A.C. Barefield 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Q. Nian and J.J. Hardesty and J.E. Cohen and X. Xi... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Brennan, Emily and Dunstone, Kimberley and Vittigl... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Allcott, Hunt and Lockwood, Benjamin B and Taubins... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Ve 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Manthey, Jakob and Kokole, Da\vs 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 Castan 2017 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
65 Pachon, Diana Maria 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.