Citation Analysis – Inference in clustered IV models with many and weak instruments

Inference in clustered IV models with many and weak instruments
Johannes W. Ligtenberg
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08559

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,520

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Crudu, F., G. Mellace, and Z. Sandor	2021	10	5	16.0	0.101	1.000	100%
2	Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun	2022	9	4	14.0	0.091	1.000	100%
3	Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang	2024a	6	3	10.0	0.061	1.000	100%
4	Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, J. A. Hausman, W. K. N...	2012	6	3	11.0	0.061	1.000	100%
5	Bekker, P. A. and F. Crudu	2015	6	3	11.0	0.061	1.000	100%
6	Dube, O. and S. P. Harish	2020	11	4	20.0	0.111	1.000	100%
7	Boot, T. and J. W. Ligtenberg (self)	2025	4	4	7.0	0.040	0.928	100%
8	Kleibergen, F	2002	3	3	5.0	0.030	0.843	100%
9	Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu	2022	4	2	5.0	0.040	0.811	100%
10	Andrews, I	2016	3	2	5.0	0.030	0.737	100%
11	Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, and T. Woutersen	2023	3	2	5.0	0.030	0.737	100%
12	Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee	2019	3	2	6.0	0.030	0.737	100%
13	Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov	2011	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
14	Newey, W. K. and J. R. Robins	2018	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
15	Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten	2020	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
16	Kleibergen, F	2005	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
17	Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C...	2012	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
18	Dovì, M.-S., A. B. Kock, and S. Mavroeidis	2023	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
19	Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang	2024b	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
20	Bekker, P. A	1994	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Anderson, T. W. and H. Rubin	1949	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Frandsen, B., E. Leslie, and S. McIntyre	2025	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Mikusheva, A., M. Sølvsten, and B. Jing	2025	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	S\olvsten, M	2020	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Feng, Q., S. Jaidee, and W. Wang	2025	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Barrios, T., R. Diamond, G. W. Imbens, and M. Kole...	2012	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Chetverikov, D., J. Hahn, Z. Liao, and A. Santos	2023	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	MacKinnon, J. G., M. \O. Nielsen, and M. D. Webb	2022	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Djogbenou, A. A., J. G. MacKinnon, and M. Ørregaar...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Moreira, M. J	2003	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Ackerberg, D. A. and P. J. Devereux	2009	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock	1997	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Bekker, P. A. and J. van der Ploeg	2005	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Billingsley, P	1995	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Phillips, G. D. A. and C. Hale	1977	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
37			2	1	2.0	0.020	0.110	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Crudu, F., G. Mellace, and Z. Sandor

2021

16.0

0.101

1.000

100%

Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun

2022

14.0

0.091

1.000

100%

Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang

2024a

10.0

0.061

1.000

100%

Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, J. A. Hausman, W. K. N...

2012

11.0

0.061

1.000

100%

Bekker, P. A. and F. Crudu

2015

11.0

0.061

1.000

100%

Dube, O. and S. P. Harish

2020

20.0

0.111

1.000

100%

Boot, T. and J. W. Ligtenberg (self)

2025

7.0

0.040

0.928

100%

Kleibergen, F

2002

5.0

0.030

0.843

100%

Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu

2022

5.0

0.040

0.811

100%

Andrews, I

2016

5.0

0.030

0.737

100%

Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, and T. Woutersen

2023

5.0

0.030

0.737

100%

Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee

2019

6.0

0.030

0.737

100%

Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov

2011

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Newey, W. K. and J. R. Robins

2018

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten

2020

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Kleibergen, F

2005

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C...

2012

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Dovì, M.-S., A. B. Kock, and S. Mavroeidis

2023

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang

2024b

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bekker, P. A

1994

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Anderson, T. W. and H. Rubin

1949

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Frandsen, B., E. Leslie, and S. McIntyre

2025

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Mikusheva, A., M. Sølvsten, and B. Jing

2025

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

S\olvsten, M

2020

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Feng, Q., S. Jaidee, and W. Wang

2025

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Barrios, T., R. Diamond, G. W. Imbens, and M. Kole...

2012

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chetverikov, D., J. Hahn, Z. Liao, and A. Santos

2023

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool...

2023

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

MacKinnon, J. G., M. \O. Nielsen, and M. D. Webb

2022

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Djogbenou, A. A., J. G. MacKinnon, and M. Ørregaar...

2019

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Moreira, M. J

2003

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Ackerberg, D. A. and P. J. Devereux

2009

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock

1997

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bekker, P. A. and J. van der Ploeg

2005

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Billingsley, P

1995

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Phillips, G. D. A. and C. Hale

1977

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

2.0

0.020

0.110

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.