← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Instrument-based estimation of full treatment effects with movers
Didier Nibbering, Matthijs Oosterveen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07018
82
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
16
Sections
8,559
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Finkelstein, A., S. Taubman, B. Wright, M. Bernste... 2012 7 6 10.5 0.085 0.950 86%
2 Burde, D. and L. L. Linden 2013 6 4 7.0 0.073 0.874 67%
3 Finkelstein, A. N., S. L. Taubman, H. L. Allen, B.... 2016 6 3 7.0 0.073 0.874 67%
4 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 3 3 5.0 0.037 0.843 100%
5 Anelli, M 2020 8 4 9.0 0.098 0.794 50%
6 Sugar, S., C. Peters, N. De Lew, and B. D. Sommers 2021 3 2 4.0 0.037 0.737 100%
7 Heckman, J., N. Hohmann, J. Smith, and M. Khoo 2000 3 2 4.0 0.037 0.737 100%
8 Wheeler, L., R. Garlick, E. Johnson, P. Shaw, and ... 2022 3 3 3.5 0.037 0.737 67%
9 Manski, C. F 1997 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper 2000 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 Angrist, J., D. Autor, and A. Pallais 2022 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Flores, C. A. and A. Flores-Lagunes 2013 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
13 Blackwell, M 2017 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
14 Hull, P 2018 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
15 Huber, M 2019 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
16 Duflo, E., R. Glennerster, and M. Kremer 2007 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
17 Silliman, M. and H. Virtanen 2022 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
18 Grosz, M 2020 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
19 Leu, K 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Hoekstra, M 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Ketel, N., E. Leuven, H. Oosterbeek, and B. van de... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Zimmerman, S. D 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Mealli, F. and B. Pacini 2013 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Conley, T. G., C. B. Hansen, and P. E. Rossi 2012 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Swanson, S. A., M. A. Hernan, M. Miller, J. M. Rob... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Lechner, M 2009 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Ding, W. and S. F. Lehrer 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Heckman, J. J., J. E. Humphries, and G. Veramendi 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Verdier, V 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Athey, S. and G. W. Imbens 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 De Ree, J., M. A. Maggioni, B. Paulle, D. Rossigno... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Molinari, F 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 De Haan, M 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Kreider, B., J. V. Pepper, C. Gundersen, and D. Jo... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Kreider, B. and J. V. Pepper 2007 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Battistin, E. and B. Sianesi 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Tommasi, D. and L. Zhang 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Calvi, R., A. Lewbel, and D. Tommasi 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Angrist, J. D. and G. W. Imbens 1995 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Andresen, M. E. and M. Huber 2021 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Cattaneo, M. D., N. Idrobo, and R. Titiunik 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.