← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Semiparametric Discrete Choice Models for Bundles
Fu Ouyang, Thomas T. Yang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04135
177
Citation mentions
77
Cited references
11
Sections
22,036
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Han,Aaron K. 1987 5 3 9.0 0.028 1.000 100%
2 Shi, Xiaoxia and Shum, Matthew and Song, Wei 2018 5 4 9.0 0.028 1.000 100%
3 Sherman,Robert P. 1993 7 3 14.0 0.040 1.000 100%
4 Sherman, Robert P 1994 5 4 10.0 0.028 1.000 100%
5 Sherman, Robert P 1994 9 4 18.0 0.051 1.000 100%
6 Kim,Jeankyung and Pollard,David 1990 13 6 26.0 0.073 1.000 100%
7 Seo, Myung Hwan and Otsu, Taisuke 2018 22 6 44.0 0.124 1.000 100%
8 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie 2020 6 3 12.0 0.034 1.000 100%
9 Abrevaya, Jason and Huang, Jian 2005 3 3 6.0 0.017 0.843 100%
10 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 3 3 6.0 0.017 0.843 100%
11 Fox, Jeremy T and Lazzati, Natalia 2017 4 2 6.0 0.023 0.811 100%
12 Manski, Charles F. 1987 4 2 7.0 0.023 0.811 100%
13 Pakes, Ariel and Porter, Jack 2021 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
14 Gao, Wayne Yuan and Li, Ming 2020 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
15 Pakes,Ariel and Pollard,David 1989 3 2 6.0 0.017 0.737 100%
16 Kohler, Michael and Langer, Sophie 2021 3 2 6.0 0.017 0.737 100%
17 Serfling, Robert J 2009 3 2 6.0 0.017 0.737 100%
18 Fan, Ying 2013 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
19 Khan, Shakeeb and Ouyang, Fu and Tamer, Elie (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
20 Fox, Jeremy T. 2007 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
21 Yan, Jin and Yoo, Hong Il 2019 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
22 Horowitz,Joel L. 1992 2 2 4.0 0.011 0.644 100%
23 Wang, Rui 2023 3 1 3.0 0.017 0.585 100%
24 Gentzkow, Matthew 2007 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
25 Dunker, Fabian and Hoderlein, Stefan and Kaido, Hi... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
26 Allen, Roy and Rehbeck, John 2019 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
27 Allen, Roy and Rehbeck, John 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
28 Subbotin, Viktor 2007 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
29 Hansen, Bruce E 2008 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
30 Gine 1990 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
31 Nolan,Deborah and Pollard,David 1987 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
32 Berry, Steve and Khwaja, Ahmed and Kumar, Vineet a... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Manski, Charles F and Sherman, Leonard 1980 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Train, Kenneth E and McFadden, Daniel L and Ben-Ak... 1987 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Hendel, Igal 1999 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Chung, Jaihak and Rao, Vithala R 2003 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Dube 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Nevo, Aviv and Rubinfeld, Daniel L and McCabe, Mar... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Augereau, Angelique and Greenstein, Shane and Rysm... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Song, Inseong and Chintagunta, Pradeep K 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Foubert, Bram and Gijsbrechts, Els 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Liu, Hongju and Chintagunta, Pradeep K and Zhu, Ti... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M and Sinkins... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Lewbel, Arthur and Nesheim, Lars 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Ershov, Daniel and Laliberte 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Iaria, Alessandro and Wang, Ao 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Sher, Itai and Kim, Kyoo il 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Ouyang, Fu and Yang, Thomas Tao and Zhang, Hanghui (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Lee,Lung-fei 1995 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Lewbel,Arthur 2000 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Altonji, Joseph G and Matzkin, Rosa L 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Berry, Steven T and Haile, Philip A 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Ahn, Hyungtaik and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Powell, ... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Graham, Bryan S 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Toth, Peter 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Candelaria, Luis E 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Gao, Wayne Yuan and Li, Ming and Xu, Sheng 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Abrevaya, Jason and Hausman, Jerry A and Khan, Sha... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Hong, Han and Mahajan, Aprajit and Nekipelov, Deni... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Cavanagh, Christopher and Sherman, Robert P 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Jin, Zhezhen and Ying, Zhiliang and Wei, L. J. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Horowitz, Joel L 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Chen,Xiaohong and Linton,Oliver and van Keilegom 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Arcones, Miguel A and Gine, Evarist 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Devroye, Luc 1978 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Lee, S. M. S. and Pun, M. C. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Li, Qi and Racine, Jeffrey Scott 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Hall, Peter and Racine, Jeff and Li, Qi 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Hayfield, Tristen and Racine, Jeffrey S 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Storn, R M and Price, K V 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Mullen, Katharine and Ardia, David and Gil, David ... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Fritsch, Stefan and Guenther, Frauke 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 v 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Wellner, Jon A and Zhan, Yihui 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Cameron, A Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.