Citation Analysis – Synthetic Regressing Control

Synthetic Regressing Control
Rong J. B. Zhu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02584

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,077

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Abadie, A.	2021	5	4	9.0	0.065	1.000	100%
2	Abadie, A. and Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J.	2010	9	7	15.5	0.117	0.962	89%
3	Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J.	2003	4	3	7.0	0.052	0.928	100%
4	Abadie, A. and L'Hour, J.	2021	4	4	5.5	0.052	0.928	100%
5	Kellogg, M. and Mogstad, M. and Guillaume A. Pouli...	2021	4	3	6.5	0.052	0.928	100%
6	Xu, Y.	2017	4	3	6.5	0.052	0.928	100%
7	Ferman, B. and Pinto, C.	2021	3	3	4.5	0.039	0.843	100%
8	Hsiao, C. and Ching, S. and Wan, K.S.	2012	3	2	4.5	0.039	0.737	100%
9	Ben-Michael, E. and Feller, A. and Othstein, J.	2021	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.644	100%
10	Zhu, L.P. and Li, L. and Li, R. and Zhu, L.X. (self)	2011	4	1	8.0	0.052	0.644	100%
11	Doudchenko, N. and Imbens, G. W.	2016	3	1	1.5	0.039	0.585	100%
12	Athey, S. and Bayati, M. and Imbens, G. and Qu, Z.	2019	2	1	1.0	0.026	0.511	100%
13	Viviano, D. and Bradic, J.	2023	2	1	1.0	0.026	0.511	100%
14	Athey, S. and Bayati, M. and Doudchenko, N. and Im...	2021	2	1	1.0	0.026	0.511	100%
15	Li, K.-C.	1987	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
16	Zhu, R. J. B. and Wang, H. and Zhang, X. and Liang... (self)	2023	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
17	Zhang, C.-H. and Zhang, S.	2014	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
18	Van de Geer, S. and Buhlmann, P. and Ritov, Y. and...	2014	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
19	Li, K. T.	2020	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
20	Chernozhukov, V. and W\"u	2021	2	2	2.5	0.026	0.511	50%
21	Powell, D.	2018	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
22	Amjad, M. and Shah, D. and Shen, D.	2018	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
23	Abadie, A. and Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J.	2015	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
24	Robbins, M. and Saunders, J. and Kilmer, B.	2017	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
25	Gobillon, L. and Magnac, T.	2016	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
26	Pouliot, G. A. and Xie, Z.	2022	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
27	Arkhangelsky, D. and Athey, S. and Hirshberg, D. A...	2021	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.406	100%
28	Neyman, Jerzy	1990	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
29	Hansen, B. E.	2007	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
30	Wan, A.T.K. and Wang, H. and Zhang, X. and Zou, G.	2010	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
31	J. Fan and J. Lv	2008	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
32	Agarwal, A. and Shah, D. and Shen, D.	2024	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
33	Ben-Michael, E. and Feller, A. and Rothstein, J.	2022	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
34	Whittle, P.	1960	1	1	0.5	0.013	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Abadie, A.

2021

9.0

0.065

1.000

100%

Abadie, A. and Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J.

2010

15.5

0.117

0.962

89%

Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J.

2003

7.0

0.052

0.928

100%

Abadie, A. and L'Hour, J.

2021

5.5

0.052

0.928

100%

Kellogg, M. and Mogstad, M. and Guillaume A. Pouli...

2021

6.5

0.052

0.928

100%

Xu, Y.

2017

6.5

0.052

0.928

100%

Ferman, B. and Pinto, C.

2021

4.5

0.039

0.843

100%

Hsiao, C. and Ching, S. and Wan, K.S.

2012

4.5

0.039

0.737

100%

Ben-Michael, E. and Feller, A. and Othstein, J.

2021

2.5

0.026

0.644

100%

Zhu, L.P. and Li, L. and Li, R. and Zhu, L.X. (self)

2011

8.0

0.052

0.644

100%

Doudchenko, N. and Imbens, G. W.

2016

1.5

0.039

0.585

100%

Athey, S. and Bayati, M. and Imbens, G. and Qu, Z.

2019

1.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Viviano, D. and Bradic, J.

2023

1.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Athey, S. and Bayati, M. and Doudchenko, N. and Im...

2021

1.0

0.026

0.511

100%

Li, K.-C.

1987

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Zhu, R. J. B. and Wang, H. and Zhang, X. and Liang... (self)

2023

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Zhang, C.-H. and Zhang, S.

2014

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Van de Geer, S. and Buhlmann, P. and Ritov, Y. and...

2014

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Li, K. T.

2020

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Chernozhukov, V. and W\"u

2021

2.5

0.026

0.511

50%

Powell, D.

2018

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Amjad, M. and Shah, D. and Shen, D.

2018

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Abadie, A. and Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J.

2015

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Robbins, M. and Saunders, J. and Kilmer, B.

2017

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Gobillon, L. and Magnac, T.

2016

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Pouliot, G. A. and Xie, Z.

2022

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Arkhangelsky, D. and Athey, S. and Hirshberg, D. A...

2021

0.5

0.013

0.406

100%

Neyman, Jerzy

1990

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Hansen, B. E.

2007

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Wan, A.T.K. and Wang, H. and Zhang, X. and Zou, G.

2010

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

J. Fan and J. Lv

2008

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Agarwal, A. and Shah, D. and Shen, D.

2024

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Ben-Michael, E. and Feller, A. and Rothstein, J.

2022

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Whittle, P.

1960

0.5

0.013

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.