Citation Analysis

Rank-heterogeneous preference models for school choice
Amel Awadelkarim, Arjun Seshadri, Itai Ashlagi, Irene Lo, Johan Ugander
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01801
69
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
13
Sections
5,440
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Seshadri, Arjun and Ragain, Stephen and Ugander, J... (self) 2020 5 5 8.5 0.072 1.000 100%
2 Randall G. Chapman and Richard Staelin 1982 4 4 5.5 0.058 0.928 100%
3 Jerry A. Hausman and Paul A. Ruud 1987 6 5 6.5 0.087 0.874 67%
4 R. Duncan Luce 1959 3 3 6.0 0.043 0.843 100%
5 Tuck, Jonathan and Barratt, Shane and Boyd, Stephe... 2021 3 2 6.0 0.043 0.737 100%
6 Plackett, R. L. 1968 2 2 3.0 0.029 0.644 100%
7 R. Duncan Luce 1977 2 2 3.0 0.029 0.644 100%
8 Fok, Dennis and Paap, Richard and Van Dijk, Bram 2012 2 2 3.0 0.029 0.644 100%
9 Arjun Seshadri and Alexander Peysakhovich and Joha... (self) 2019 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
10 Pathak, Parag A and Shi, Peng 2017 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
11 Calsamiglia, Caterina and Fu, Chao and G\"u 2020 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
12 Justine S. Hastings and Thomas J. Kane and Douglas... 2008 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
13 McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth 2000 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
14 Tomlinson, Kiran and Benson, Austin R 2021 2 2 1.5 0.029 0.644 100%
15 Mariana Laverde 2 1 1.0 0.029 0.511 100%
16 Kenneth Train 2009 2 1 4.0 0.029 0.511 100%
17 Agarwal, Nikhil and Somaini, Paulo 2018 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila and Pathak, Parag A. and Sch... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Agarwal, Nikhil and Somaini, Paulo 2020 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Paul D. Allison and Nicholas A. Christakis 1994 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Amos Tversky 1969 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Amos Tversky and Itamar Simonson 1993 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Richard R. Batsell and John C. Polking 1985 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Bower, Amanda and Balzano, Laura 2020 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
25 McFadden, Daniel 1978 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Punj, Girish N. and Staelin, Richard 1983 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Critchlow, Douglas E. and Fligner, Michael A. and ... 1991 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 D. Gale and L. S. Shapley 1962 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila and Pathak, Parag A. and Rot... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Haan, Monique De and Gautier, Pieter and Oosterbee... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Itai Ashlagi and Afshin Nikzad and Assaf Romm (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Itai Ashlagi and Afshin Nikzad (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Pathak, Parag A. and Shi, Peng 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Trueblood, Jennifer S and Brown, Scott D and Heath... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Mikolov, Tomas and Chen, Kai and Corrado, Greg and... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Kim, Seung-Jean and Koh, Kwangmoo and Boyd, Stephe... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Smola, Alexander J and Kondor, Risi 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Wang, Yu-Xiang and Sharpnack, James and Smola, Ale... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Land, Stephanie R and Friedman, Jerome H 1997 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Tibshirani, Robert and Saunders, Michael and Rosse... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Xia, Lirong 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Kingma, Diederik P. and Ba, Jimmy 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.